| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | ***''[[Carson v. Simon]]'', 978 F.3d 1051 (8th Cir. 2020) | | ***''[[Carson v. Simon]]'', 978 F.3d 1051 (8th Cir. 2020) |
| | *Cook v. Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 (2001) | | *Cook v. Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 (2001) |
| − | **''[[Crawford v. Marion Cnty. El. Bd.]]'', 553 U.S. 181 (2008) | + | **''[[Crawford v. Marion Cnty. El. Bd.]]'', 553 U.S. 181 (2008) (landmark decision upholding the constitutionality of voter identification requirements) |
| | *Democratic Nat’l Comm. v. Wis. State Legis., 141 S. Ct. 28 (2020) | | *Democratic Nat’l Comm. v. Wis. State Legis., 141 S. Ct. 28 (2020) |
| | *Dep’t of Homeland Security v. New York, 140 S. Ct. 599 (2020) | | *Dep’t of Homeland Security v. New York, 140 S. Ct. 599 (2020) |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
| | *Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Way, Civil No. 20-10753, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196911 (D.N.J. Oct. 22, 2020) | | *Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Way, Civil No. 20-10753, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196911 (D.N.J. Oct. 22, 2020) |
| | *Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) | | *Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) |
| − | ***''[[FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate]]'',596 U.S. 289 (2022) | + | ***''[[FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate]]'', 596 U.S. 289 (2022) (finding legal [[standing]] and then ruling in favor of Sen. Ted Cruz on a limitation on raising money post-election to repay a candidate's personal loan to the campaign) |
| | *Feehan v. Wis. Elections Comm’n, 506 F. Supp. 3d 596 (E.D. Wis. 2020) | | *Feehan v. Wis. Elections Comm’n, 506 F. Supp. 3d 596 (E.D. Wis. 2020) |
| | *''[[Foster v. Love]]'', 522 U.S. 67 (1997) (relates to the issue of Election Day as one day) | | *''[[Foster v. Love]]'', 522 U.S. 67 (1997) (relates to the issue of Election Day as one day) |
| Line 30: |
Line 30: |
| | *Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 (1969) | | *Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 (1969) |
| | *N.Y. State Bd. of Elections v. Lopez Torres, 552 U.S. 196 (2008) | | *N.Y. State Bd. of Elections v. Lopez Torres, 552 U.S. 196 (2008) |
| − | **''[[Purcell v. Gonzalez]]'', 549 U.S. 1 (2006) | + | **''[[Purcell v. Gonzalez]]'', 549 U.S. 1 (2006) (a per curiam [[shadow docket]] reversal of a Ninth Circuit last-minute injunction before an election) |
| | *Republican Nat’l Comm. v. Burgess, No. 3:24-cv-00198-MMD-CLB, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126371 (D. Nev. July 17, 2024) | | *Republican Nat’l Comm. v. Burgess, No. 3:24-cv-00198-MMD-CLB, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126371 (D. Nev. July 17, 2024) |
| | **''[[Republican Nat’l Comm., et al., v. Wetzel]]'', et al., No. 24-60395, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27203 (5th Cir. Oct. 25, 2024) | | **''[[Republican Nat’l Comm., et al., v. Wetzel]]'', et al., No. 24-60395, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27203 (5th Cir. Oct. 25, 2024) |