Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,657
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 182:
Line 182: +
Talk:Mystery: Was John a Samaritan (view source)
Revision as of 00:35, October 12, 2025
, 00:35, October 12, 2025Good points, but the primary hypothesis is that John (not Jesus) was a Samaritan.
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_75c45e2b-bd9c-4937-aa7e-066798efb0df What is the probability that the essay at https://www.conservapedia.com/Mystery:_Was_John_a_Samaritan engages in the argumentation type commonly known as elephant hurling? If it does engage in elephant hurling, why is that? How much weaker is the essay due to it not tackling the strongest arguments that John was not a Samaritan and please explain why if this is the case?] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:39, October 11, 2025 (EDT)
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_75c45e2b-bd9c-4937-aa7e-066798efb0df What is the probability that the essay at https://www.conservapedia.com/Mystery:_Was_John_a_Samaritan engages in the argumentation type commonly known as elephant hurling? If it does engage in elephant hurling, why is that? How much weaker is the essay due to it not tackling the strongest arguments that John was not a Samaritan and please explain why if this is the case?] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:39, October 11, 2025 (EDT)
**About Jesus as asuppsed "Samaritan".'''1'''. The Samaritans who are a mixed, and claimed to be Jews and never accepted Jerusalem and its Temple. But chose mount Gerizim. While Jesus only visited Jerusalem. '''2'''. Joseph and Mary were not in Samaria. But in Judea. No one doubts Joseph or James (Jacob/Yakov) being ordinary Jews. '''3'''. He regularly worshipped in Jewish communal worship. '''4'''In general, one should go to the original conversion: Y into J [Jacob, Jesus, John, etc ] in English pronunciation while in original Germanic it is still pronounced as in Y in English. There is no "J" in the original Bible, of course.[[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:16, October 11, 2025 (EDT)
**About Jesus as asuppsed "Samaritan".'''1'''. The Samaritans who are a mixed, and claimed to be Jews and never accepted Jerusalem and its Temple. But chose mount Gerizim. While Jesus only visited Jerusalem. '''2'''. Joseph and Mary were not in Samaria. But in Judea. No one doubts Joseph or James (Jacob/Yakov) being ordinary Jews. '''3'''. He regularly worshipped in Jewish communal worship. '''4'''In general, one should go to the original conversion: Y into J [Jacob, Jesus, John, etc ] in English pronunciation while in original Germanic it is still pronounced as in Y in English. There is no "J" in the original Bible, of course.[[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:16, October 11, 2025 (EDT)
::Good points, but the primary hypothesis is that John (not Jesus) was a Samaritan.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:35, October 11, 2025 (EDT)