Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,824
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 219:
Line 219: +
Talk:Mystery: Was John a Samaritan (view source)
Revision as of 09:22, October 12, 2025
, 09:22, October 12, 2025→The essay assembles a bunch of Lilliputian-size poor arguments and some invalid arguments while ignoring the Gulliver-sized scale of established evidence that the Apostle John was Jewish
These arguments often rely on absence of evidence or cherry-picked details, lacking empirical support from archaeology, textual criticism, or patristic sources, making them collectively weak against the "Gulliver" scale of established evidence for John's Jewish identity."[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_4512579b-6e87-4d02-881c-61dca6636b19] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:52, October 12, 2025 (EDT)
These arguments often rely on absence of evidence or cherry-picked details, lacking empirical support from archaeology, textual criticism, or patristic sources, making them collectively weak against the "Gulliver" scale of established evidence for John's Jewish identity."[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_4512579b-6e87-4d02-881c-61dca6636b19] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:52, October 12, 2025 (EDT)
:Now Andy may claim that he addressed the arguments that I provided via Grok, but did he? He did not truly engage the arguments. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:22, October 12, 2025 (EDT)
== The essay "Mystery: Was John a Samaritan" engages in the poor argumentation tactic of "elephant hurling" ==
== The essay "Mystery: Was John a Samaritan" engages in the poor argumentation tactic of "elephant hurling" ==