Difference between revisions of "Sanctuary city for the unborn"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
 
|[[Waskom, Texas]]
 
|[[Waskom, Texas]]
 
|June 11, 2019
 
|June 11, 2019
−
|City Council action 5-0
+
|City Council action (5-0)
 
|First city to pass such an ordinance.  After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on March 11, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 
|First city to pass such an ordinance.  After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on March 11, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 30: Line 30:
 
|Omaha, Texas
 
|Omaha, Texas
 
|September 9, 2019
 
|September 9, 2019
−
|City Council action 5-0
+
|City Council action (5-0)
 
|Later replaced with a "resolution" passed 3-2 upon advice of city attorney.
 
|Later replaced with a "resolution" passed 3-2 upon advice of city attorney.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 36: Line 36:
 
|Naples, Texas
 
|Naples, Texas
 
|September 9, 2019
 
|September 9, 2019
−
|City Council action 5-1
+
|City Council action (5-1)
 
|After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on April 27, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 
|After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on April 27, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 42: Line 42:
 
|Joaquin, Texas
 
|Joaquin, Texas
 
|September 17, 2019
 
|September 17, 2019
−
|City Council action 5-0
+
|City Council action (5-0)
 
|After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on March 17, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 
|After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on March 17, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 50: Line 50:
 
|City Council action (unanimous)
 
|City Council action (unanimous)
 
|After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on April 27, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 
|After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on April 27, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
 +
|-
 +
|6
 +
|Gilmer, Texas
 +
|September 24, 2019
 +
|City Council action (4-2, two members not present)
 +
|
 
|}
 
|}
  
−
#Gilmer, Texas
 
 
#Westbrook, Texas (the first city outside of East Texas to pass such an ordinance)
 
#Westbrook, Texas (the first city outside of East Texas to pass such an ordinance)
 
#Rusk, Texas
 
#Rusk, Texas

Revision as of 19:35, November 14, 2025

A sanctuary city for the unborn is a municipality which has passed a legal ordinance, prohibiting the performing of abortions within its municipal limits. The term is taken from "sanctuary city" (a city that openly states that it will not enforce immigration laws) and differs from an abortion sanctuary city (which is a city that will allow abortions no matter what other jurisdictions do).

The cities which have passed such ordinances or have considered doing so are generally very small rural towns (though the largest city, Lubbock, Texas, is over 250,000 population and is home to a large state university) where the city (or the county in which it is located) is overwhelmingly conservative, Republican and pro-life; even if the area was heavily liberal, Democrat and openly supported abortion on demand, abortion clinics likely would not open in those towns due to the lack of potential clients (though Lubbock was home to one). Even so, it has not stopped abortion advocacy groups from threatening to sue if such an ordinance is passed, which has caused some towns to not take any action and at least two towns to withdraw the ordinances passed.

Most of the ordinances have two parts: a public section and a private section.

  • The public section generally would allow the municipality to fine anyone who performs an abortion, or "aids and abets" in one. However, the section generally states that the fines cannot be imposed unless 1) it is determined that enforcing the fine would not create an "undue burden" upon one seeking an abortion, 2) whoever commits the abortion lacks standing in the courts to assert third-party rights on behalf of one seeking an abortion, or 3) Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey are overturned.
  • The private section generally would allow individuals to sue anyone who performs or "aids and abets" in an abortion (except the mother who has the abortion), making that person liable in tort to the mother and/or father of the aborted child for compensatory damages (including damages for emotional distress), punitive damages, and court costs and attorney's fees. In addition, any private individual may file suit against anyone who performs or "aids and abets" in an abortion (again, except the mother who has the abortion), and can be granted injunctive relief, statutory damages, and court costs and attorney's fees. However, unlike the public section, this section usually has immediate effect. (This provision, which is highly controversial, made its way into the Texas Heartbeat Act.)

These cities differ from those which have passed resolutions opposing abortion, as a resolution is only "the opinion" of the city and has no legal effect.

The movement began in Texas, a generally pro-life state, with the passage of such an ordinance in the town of Waskom, Texas (located on the Louisiana border) on June 11, 2019, but as of May 2021 has spread to at least two other states.

Official Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn

The list is current as of August 11, 2022. Cities which subsequently repealed ordinances are shown to maintain the official count by Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn.

Number City and State Date Ordinance Passed How Ordinance Passed Notes
1 Waskom, Texas June 11, 2019 City Council action (5-0) First city to pass such an ordinance. After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on March 11, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
2 Omaha, Texas September 9, 2019 City Council action (5-0) Later replaced with a "resolution" passed 3-2 upon advice of city attorney.
3 Naples, Texas September 9, 2019 City Council action (5-1) After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on April 27, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
4 Joaquin, Texas September 17, 2019 City Council action (5-0) After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on March 17, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
5 Tenaha, Texas September 23, 2019 City Council action (unanimous) After being sued the council amended and strengthened the ordinance on April 27, 2020, after which the suit was dropped; no taxpayer money was required to defend the action.
6 Gilmer, Texas September 24, 2019 City Council action (4-2, two members not present)
  1. Westbrook, Texas (the first city outside of East Texas to pass such an ordinance)
  2. Rusk, Texas
  3. Colorado City, Texas
  4. Gary, Texas
  5. Big Spring, Texas
  6. Wells, Texas
  7. Whiteface, Texas
  8. East Mountain, Texas
  9. New Home, Texas
  10. Morton, Texas
  11. Ackerly, Texas
  12. Grapeland, Texas
  13. Goldsmith, Texas
  14. Carbon, Texas
  15. Gorman, Texas
  16. Murchison, Texas
  17. Latexo, Texas
  18. Hayes Center, Nebraska (the first city outside of Texas known to have passed such an ordinance)
  19. Blue Hill, Nebraska
  20. Lubbock, Texas (by far the largest city to pass such an ordinance, and the first city where an abortion clinic actually operates to pass such an ordinance; this required a vote of the citizenry to pass after the council refused to do so)
  21. Abernathy, Texas
  22. Poynor, Texas
  23. Lebanon, Ohio (making Ohio the third state to have a city pass such an ordinance)
  24. Levelland, Texas
  25. Sundown, Texas
  26. Sterling City, Texas
  27. Centerville, Texas
  28. Eastland, Texas
  29. Leona, Texas
  30. Crawford, Texas
  31. Brownsboro, Texas
  32. Impact, Texas
  33. Nazareth, Texas
  34. Cisco, Texas
  35. Mason, Ohio (repealed its ordinance upon election of new council members)
  36. Anson, Texas
  37. Slaton, Texas
  38. Jewett, Texas
  39. Shallowater, Texas
  40. Pollock, Louisiana (making Louisiana the fourth state to have a city pass such an ordinance)
  41. Lindale, Texas (the first city to pass an ordinance by City Council action as a result of a citizen's petition without the matter having to go to the voters)
  42. Marquez, Texas
  43. Willey, Iowa (making Iowa the fifth state to have a city pass such an ordinance)
  44. Normangee, Texas
  45. Stapleton, Nebraska

External Links