Changes

m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Monophysites''' believe that Christ has only one nature. This doctrine was condemned as heresy at the [[Council of Chalcedon|Council of Chalcedon in 471]]. The proponents of this view hold that the human will and the divine will of Christ were perfectly cooperative, his human will freely and fully subordinated to his divine will. [[Monothelites]] hold that Christ has only one will and activity, the divine will and activity.
+
'''Monophysites''' believe that Christ has only one nature. This doctrine was condemned as heresy at the [[Council of Chalcedon]] in 471 AD. The proponents of this view hold that the human will and the divine will of Christ were perfectly co-operative, his human will freely and fully subordinated to his divine will. [[Monothelites]] hold that Christ has only one will and activity, the divine will and activity.
 +
 
 +
The point of view of perfect co-operation is supported by Psalm 39:8, which reads:
 +
 
 +
:To obey your will?
 +
:My God, I have always loved your Law
 +
:From the depths of my being.
 +
 
 +
Also, we may reason towards the same conclusion from Ephesians 3:19, which speaks of:
 +
 
 +
:[T]he love of Christ, which is above all knowledge...
 +
 
 +
together with the ideas that that love makes us will what God wills, and that one mark of friendship is to will and choose the same.
 +
 
 +
Further, Christ, as united to God, had full understanding.  And the Saints in heaven are believed to have gained full understanding, according to 1st Corinthians 13:12:
 +
 
 +
:Now we are seeing a dim reflection in a mirror; but then we shall be seeing face to face. The knowledge that I have now is imperfect; but then I shall know as fully as I am known.
 +
 
 +
And they are said to have attained happiness, and this must be by willing only what God wills, for a commonly supported definition of happiness is by Saint Augustine as belonging to one "who has what he wills, and wills nothing amiss" (''On the Trinity'' [400-416 AD], Book 13, ch. 5).
 +
 
 +
Yet Augustine explains (''Answer to Maximinus the Arian'' [427-428 AD], Book 2, ch. 20): "When Christ says 'Not what I will, but what Thou wilt', He shows Himself to have willed something else than did His Father; and this could only have been by His human heart, since He did not transfigure our weakness into His Divine but into His human will."
 +
 
 +
==The multiple will of Christ's human nature==
 +
 
 +
The question of whether there are two wills and the subsequent question of whether there are two natures in Christ is really unrelated to a different but similar question that nevertheless aids the understanding: did Christ's ''human nature'' have two wills that moved Him, especially with regard to His Passion?<ref>Aquinas, Thomas (1267-1274). "Whether the human will of Christ was altogether conformed to the Divine Will in the thing willed?". ''Treatise on the Incarnation'' (Italy), Question 18, Article 5.</ref><br>
 +
Monophysite is also called '''Miaphysite Christology''' the belief that Jesus Christ is fully divine and fully human, in one united nature, which is a position held by the [[Oriental Orthodox Churches]]. This differs from the '''dyophysitism''' of other Christian denominations, which teaches that Jesus has two distinct natures, one divine and one human<ref>https://www.gorgiaspress.com/miaphysite-christology</ref>.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 7: Line 32:  
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
* [http://carm.org/monophysitism Monophysitism] (carm.org)
 
* [http://carm.org/monophysitism Monophysitism] (carm.org)
−
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10489b.htm Catholic Encyclopedia: Monophysites and Monophysitism]
+
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10489b.htm ''Catholic Encyclopedia'': Monophysites and Monophysitism]
 +
 
 +
==Reference==
       
[[Category:Heresies]]
 
[[Category:Heresies]]
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,357

edits