Changes

==The Biden Putsch==

==The Biden Putsch==

{{See also|Democrat election fraud|Biden Putsch}}

:{{See also|Democrat election fraud|Biden Putsch}}

Biden openly hinted at intent to commit [[treason]] and [[insurrection]], with aid from the Democrat Party, by claiming that four former joint chiefs of staff are ready to act,<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/colin-powell-s-criticism-means-four-ex-chairmen-joint-chiefs-n1227101</ref> referring to four ''former'' chairmen of the [[Joint Chiefs of Staff]] and now retired generals and admirals — Retired Navy Admiral [[Mike Mullen]], Retired Army General Martin Dempsey, Retired Air Force General Richard Myers, and Retired Army General [[Colin Powell]] — who have publicly criticized Trump’s notice that he may use federal troops to quell the [[Leftist insurrection]] if necessary, protect lives, and restore calm.

Biden openly hinted at intent to commit [[treason]] and insurrection, with aid from the Democrat Party, by claiming that four former joint chiefs of staff are ready to act,<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/colin-powell-s-criticism-means-four-ex-chairmen-joint-chiefs-n1227101</ref> referring to four ''former'' chairmen of the [[Joint Chiefs of Staff]] and now retired generals and admirals — Retired Navy Admiral [[Mike Mullen]], Retired Army General Martin Dempsey, Retired Air Force General Richard Myers, and Retired Army General [[Colin Powell]] — who have publicly criticized Trump’s notice that he may use federal troops to quell the [[Leftist insurrection]] if necessary, protect lives, and restore calm.

Biden suggested that retired generals who publicly criticized the current elected president may be pressed into action by Biden to enforce the results of an election. Biden seemed to suggest that Biden can decide if Trump could only be reelected illegitimately. He apparently believes he has the support of the military, active and retired, to depose Trump. As disclosures mounted that outgoing [[Vice President]] Biden himself in 2017 thought that he and his administration had a right to surveil the [[2016 Trump campaign]] and [[Trump transition]]. Biden himself requested the unmasking of an American citizen in subsequent intelligence transcripts; the name had been redacted and was then [[illegal]]ly [[leak]]ed to the press. Biden was part of an Obama team that approved spying on [[General Michael Flynn]], Trump’s designated [[national security adviser]] — all justified on the notion of “[[Russian collusion]]” that at that time had already been debunked by the [[Obama administration]]’s own [[FBI]].

Biden suggested that retired generals who publicly criticized the current elected president may be pressed into action by Biden to enforce the results of an election. Biden seemed to suggest that Biden can decide if Trump could only be reelected illegitimately. He apparently believes he has the support of the military, active and retired, to depose Trump. As disclosures mounted that outgoing [[Vice President]] Biden himself in 2017 thought that he and his administration had a right to surveil the [[2016 Trump campaign]] and [[Trump transition]]. Biden himself requested the unmasking of an American citizen in subsequent intelligence transcripts; the name had been redacted and was then [[illegal]]ly [[leak]]ed to the press. Biden was part of an Obama team that approved spying on [[General Michael Flynn]], Trump’s designated [[national security adviser]] — all justified on the notion of “[[Russian collusion]]” that at that time had already been debunked by the [[Obama administration]]’s own [[FBI]].

In the early 2000s, Obama [[apparatchik]] [[Michael McFaul]] studied the so-called color revolutions in the former states of the [[Soviet Union]]. McFaul identified the seven elements of successful [[revolution]]s in these countries.<ref>https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/transitions-from-postcommunism/</ref>  Reporting from [[far left]] ''[[The Atlantic]]'' and ''[[The New York Times]]'' fits into step number seven. Both publications ran stories highlighting racial, gender, and sexual orientation divisions in the military in early September 2020.<ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/09/womens-military-friendships-are-unique-and-special/615991/</ref><ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/31/us/politics/marines-race-general.html</ref>

In the early 2000s, Obama [[apparatchik]] [[Michael McFaul]] studied the so-called color revolutions in the former states of the [[Soviet Union]]. McFaul identified the seven elements of successful [[revolution]]s in these countries.<ref>https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/transitions-from-postcommunism/</ref>  Reporting from [[far left]] ''[[The Atlantic]]'' and ''[[The New York Times]]'' fits into step number seven. Both publications ran stories highlighting racial, gender, and sexual orientation divisions in the military in early September 2020.<ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/09/womens-military-friendships-are-unique-and-special/615991/</ref><ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/31/us/politics/marines-race-general.html</ref>

1.) The first element of a successful color revolution, according to McFaul, is a semi-autocratic rather than fully-autocratic regime. This narrative about [[President Trump]] has been pervasive in the [[liberal media]] and echoed by prominent [[Democrat]]s since before he was elected. Despite all evidence to the contrary, President Trump is consistently painted as walking the line between [[constitutional]] order and [[authoritarianism]].  Over the Summer of 2020, Democrats and the [[fake news]] media resurfaced the narrative that President Trump will not accept the [[2020 presidential election]] results if [[Joe Biden]] wins.<ref>https://theintercept.com/2020/08/11/trump-november-2020-election/</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/27/heres-how-prepare-trump-rejecting-election-results-november/</ref>  They assert that he will refuse to concede and will have to be forced out of the [[White House]] if he loses the election.  

1.) The first element of a successful color revolution, according to McFaul, is a semi-autocratic rather than fully-autocratic regime. This [[narrative]] about [[President Trump]] has been pervasive in the [[liberal media]] and echoed by prominent [[Democrat]]s since before he was elected. Despite all evidence to the contrary, President Trump is consistently painted as walking the line between [[constitutional]] order and [[authoritarianism]].  Over the Summer of 2020, Democrats and the [[fake news]] media resurfaced the narrative that President Trump will not accept the [[2020 presidential election]] results if [[Joe Biden]] wins.<ref>https://theintercept.com/2020/08/11/trump-november-2020-election/</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/27/heres-how-prepare-trump-rejecting-election-results-november/</ref>  They assert that he will refuse to concede and will have to be forced out of the [[White House]] if he loses the election.  

2.) According to McFaul, the second requirement is 'an unpopular incumbent'. [[The left]] uses [[identity politics]] to try and make President Trump unpopular with specific constituencies. "Peaceful Protests" are used to create an illusion there are hordes of citizens who oppose President Trump. The fake news [[mainstream media]] and Democrats try to frame the riots as “Trump’s America,” despite all the evidence the [[riot]]s are supported by Democrats in power and even financially supported by members of the [[2020 Biden campaign]].<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-minneapolis-police-biden-bail/biden-staff-donate-to-group-that-pays-bail-in-riot-torn-minneapolis-idUSKBN2360SZ</ref>

2.) According to McFaul, the second requirement is 'an unpopular incumbent'. [[The left]] uses [[identity politics]] to try and make President Trump unpopular with specific constituencies. "Peaceful Protests" are used to create an illusion there are hordes of citizens who oppose President Trump. The fake news [[mainstream media]] and Democrats try to frame the riots as “Trump’s America,” despite all the evidence the [[riot]]s are supported by Democrats in power and even financially supported by members of the [[2020 Biden campaign]].<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-minneapolis-police-biden-bail/biden-staff-donate-to-group-that-pays-bail-in-riot-torn-minneapolis-idUSKBN2360SZ</ref>

====TIP's "clear Trump win" scenario====

====TIP's "clear Trump win" scenario====

Whitney Webb analysized the [[Uniparty]]'s war games:

[[Whitney Webb]] analyzed the [[Uniparty]]'s war games:

{{quotebox|In the TIP’s “clear Trump win” scenario (see page 17),<ref>https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7013152/Preventing-a-Disrupted-Presidential-Election-and.pdf</ref> Joe Biden – played in the war game by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager and chief of staff to former President Bill Clinton – retracted his election night concession and subsequently convinced “three states with Democratic governors – [[North Carolina]], Wisconsin and Michigan – to ask for recounts.” Then, the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan “sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislature” to the Electoral College, which Trump had won, in an attempt to undermine, if not prevent, that win.

{{quotebox|In the TIP’s “clear Trump win” scenario (see page 17),<ref>https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7013152/Preventing-a-Disrupted-Presidential-Election-and.pdf</ref> Joe Biden – played in the war game by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager and chief of staff to former President Bill Clinton – retracted his election night concession and subsequently convinced “three states with Democratic governors – [[North Carolina]], Wisconsin and Michigan – to ask for recounts.” Then, the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan “sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislature” to the Electoral College, which Trump had won, in an attempt to undermine, if not prevent, that win.

In other words, these “structural reforms” involve the creation of what essentially amounts to having the U.S. by composed 56 states, with the new states set to ensure a perpetual majority for Democrats, as only Democrat-majority areas ([[Washington, D.C.|DC]], [[Puerto Rico]] and California) are given statehood. Notably, in other scenarios where Biden won the Electoral College, Democrats did not support its elimination.  

In other words, these “structural reforms” involve the creation of what essentially amounts to having the U.S. by composed 56 states, with the new states set to ensure a perpetual majority for Democrats, as only Democrat-majority areas ([[Washington, D.C.|DC]], [[Puerto Rico]] and California) are given statehood. Notably, in other scenarios where Biden won the Electoral College, Democrats did not support its elimination.  

Also notable is the fact that, in this simulation, the TIP blamed the Trump campaign for the Democrats’ decision to take the “provocative, unprecedented actions” laid out above, asserting that Trump’s campaign had “created the conditions to force the Biden campaign” into taking these actions by doing things like giving “an interview to The Intercept in which he [Trump] stated that he would have lost the election if [[Bernie Sanders]] had been nominated” instead of Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate.  

Also notable is the fact that, in this simulation, the TIP blamed the Trump campaign for the Democrats’ decision to take the “provocative, unprecedented actions” laid out above, asserting that Trump’s campaign had “created the conditions to force the Biden campaign” into taking these actions by doing things like giving “an interview to ''[[The Intercept]]'' in which he [Trump] stated that he would have lost the election if [[Bernie Sanders]] had been nominated” instead of Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate.  

The TIP also claimed that the Trump campaign would seek to paint these “provocative, unpredecented actions” as “the Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup,” despite the fact that that is essentially what those actions entail. Indeed, in other simulations where the Trump campaign behaved along these lines, the TIP’s rhetoric about this category of extreme actions is decidedly different.

The TIP also claimed that the Trump campaign would seek to paint these “provocative, unpredecented actions” as “the Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup,” despite the fact that that is essentially what those actions entail. Indeed, in other simulations where the Trump campaign behaved along these lines, the TIP’s rhetoric about this category of extreme actions is decidedly different.

The Times noted that one plan would include a “kill switch” to shut down political ads after Election Day. The company officials believe the ads, which Facebook does not check for truthfulness, could be used to disseminate misinformation.   

The Times noted that one plan would include a “kill switch” to shut down political ads after Election Day. The company officials believe the ads, which Facebook does not check for truthfulness, could be used to disseminate misinformation.   

The newspaper said [[YouTube]] and [[Twitter]] also discussed their own plans if the postelection period becomes problematic.<ref>https://www.newsmax.com/politics/facebook-election-results-dispute-social-media/2020/08/21/id/983301/</ref> Michael Anton of the ''American Mind'' observed, "Once the ruling class gives word that the narrative is “Trump lost,” all the president’s social media accounts will be suspended. The T.V. channels, with the likely exception of Fox News, will refuse to cover anything he says. Count on it. He’s going to need a way to talk to the American people and he has to find the means, now."<ref>https://americanmind.org/essays/the-coming-coup/</ref><ref>https://youtu.be/uPNXOFDqD0Q?list=PLNEPP7NLqujVX_zxZbDLeb3zNMjwgjhZB</ref>

The newspaper said [[YouTube]] and [[Twitter]] also discussed their own plans if the postelection period becomes problematic.<ref>https://www.newsmax.com/politics/facebook-election-results-dispute-social-media/2020/08/21/id/983301/</ref> [[Michael Anton]] of the ''American Mind'' observed, "Once the ruling class gives word that the narrative is “Trump lost,” all the president’s social media accounts will be suspended. The T.V. channels, with the likely exception of Fox News, will refuse to cover anything he says. Count on it. He’s going to need a way to talk to the American people and he has to find the means, now."<ref>https://americanmind.org/essays/the-coming-coup/</ref><ref>https://youtu.be/uPNXOFDqD0Q?list=PLNEPP7NLqujVX_zxZbDLeb3zNMjwgjhZB</ref>

Jessica Hertz, a former Associate General Counsel of Regulatory Matters at Facebook, joined the "transition team" of Joe Biden in September 2020.  During Hertz’s tenure at the company, Facebook was embroiled in a host of controversies where conservatives – including President Trump – saw their content [[censor]]ed and, in some cases, de-platformed.  Hertz worked in the Obama [[White House]] from 2009 to 2014, where, from 2012 to 2014 she served as Principal Deputy Counsel to then-Vice President Biden. She’s also donated over $5,000 to Democratic candidates since the 2016 election cycle, with $2,000 funneled directly to the Biden campaign.<ref>https://thenationalpulse.com/politics/biden-facebook-team/</ref>

Jessica Hertz, a former Associate General Counsel of Regulatory Matters at Facebook, joined the "transition team" of Joe Biden in September 2020.  During Hertz’s tenure at the company, Facebook was embroiled in a host of controversies where conservatives – including President Trump – saw their content [[censor]]ed and, in some cases, de-platformed.  Hertz worked in the Obama [[White House]] from 2009 to 2014, where, from 2012 to 2014 she served as Principal Deputy Counsel to then-Vice President Biden. She’s also donated over $5,000 to Democratic candidates since the 2016 election cycle, with $2,000 funneled directly to the Biden campaign.<ref>https://thenationalpulse.com/politics/biden-facebook-team/</ref>

{{Anchor|ShutDownDC}}

{{Anchor|ShutDownDC}}

====ShutDownDC====

====ShutDownDC====

We are not seeking a ‘return to normalcy,’ because we know that returning to ‘normal’ means returning to a system that was built on oppression. Rather, we see this as the time to rise up against the current crisis and move forward to dismantle the interlocking systems of oppression that have plagued this land for centuries. [...]

We are not seeking a ‘return to normalcy,’ because we know that returning to ‘normal’ means returning to a system that was built on oppression. Rather, we see this as the time to rise up against the current crisis and move forward to dismantle the interlocking systems of oppression that have plagued this land for centuries. [...]

But we also recognize that forcing Trump from office is the only way to protect ourselves and the people we love from Trump’s wrath, so we will act with the urgency that the situation requires. [...] we plan to use the tools and tactical approaches that we have the capacity and expertise to implement, including disruptive direct action, mass mobilization, coordinated non-compliance, mutual aid, and other forms of civil resistance.<ref>https://www.shutdowndc.org/principles</ref>}}

But we also recognize that forcing Trump from office is the only way to protect ourselves and the people we love from Trump’s wrath, so we will act with the urgency that the situation requires. [...] we plan to use the tools and tactical approaches that we have the capacity and expertise to implement, including disruptive direct action, mass [[mobilization]], coordinated non-compliance, mutual aid, and other forms of civil resistance.<ref>https://www.shutdowndc.org/principles</ref>}}

===Constitutional crisis===

===Constitutional crisis===

{{Anchor|EMP attack}}

{{Anchor|EMP attack}}

====EMP====

====EMP====

[[File:EMP over US.PNG|right|300px|thumb|]]

[[File:EMP over US.PNG|right|300px|thumb|]]

The threat of an EMP attack is more prevalent and sophisticated now than in 2014 when then-[[National Security Agency]] chief [[Adm. Mike Rogers]] warned nations, including China and “probably one or two other” countries, were quickly developing the capability.

The threat of an EMP attack is more prevalent and sophisticated now than in 2014 when then-[[National Security Agency]] chief [[Adm. Mike Rogers]] warned nations, including China and “probably one or two other” countries, were quickly developing the capability.