Difference between revisions of "Talk:Disease vector"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:Vector moved to Talk:Disease vector: separate biology from physics/math) |
(Talk page is for figuring out ways to improve the article. Can you think of a way?) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
As I become more comfortable with LaTeX, i'll be adding many more formuals and pictures. Right now, the article probably doesn't read well because math necessitates a lot of equations. I intend to fix thsi up and also cover many more topics in vectors, extending to calculus of vector-valued functions, assuming I'm not tossed off the wiki for standing up for the truth. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 13:36, 28 June 2007 (EDT) | As I become more comfortable with LaTeX, i'll be adding many more formuals and pictures. Right now, the article probably doesn't read well because math necessitates a lot of equations. I intend to fix thsi up and also cover many more topics in vectors, extending to calculus of vector-valued functions, assuming I'm not tossed off the wiki for standing up for the truth. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 13:36, 28 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Needs disambiguation - or splitting into separate articles. I suggest a bio/math split. Have the two kinds of biological vectors in one article; the math and physics vectors in another. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:58, 3 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Why in the world would you totally blank my contributions as opposed to clean them up? That's ridiculously counter-productive. It's a much better use of resources to clean things up as opposed to erase them entirely, even if we do switch to a disambiguation. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 00:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I replaced your contribution with mine, because I thought mine would be easier for our readers to understand. That ''is'' a clean-up. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :If you can improve upon what I've done, you are free to do so. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:43, 6 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:43, July 6, 2007
A vector is the medium in which genetic material is carried. A chromosome is also considered a vector.--TimS 10:30, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
As I become more comfortable with LaTeX, i'll be adding many more formuals and pictures. Right now, the article probably doesn't read well because math necessitates a lot of equations. I intend to fix thsi up and also cover many more topics in vectors, extending to calculus of vector-valued functions, assuming I'm not tossed off the wiki for standing up for the truth. Stryker 13:36, 28 June 2007 (EDT)
- Needs disambiguation - or splitting into separate articles. I suggest a bio/math split. Have the two kinds of biological vectors in one article; the math and physics vectors in another. --Ed Poor Talk 12:58, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
- Why in the world would you totally blank my contributions as opposed to clean them up? That's ridiculously counter-productive. It's a much better use of resources to clean things up as opposed to erase them entirely, even if we do switch to a disambiguation. Stryker 00:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)
- I replaced your contribution with mine, because I thought mine would be easier for our readers to understand. That is a clean-up.