| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[File:Andrea Mantegna 087.jpg|thumbnail|300px|Saint Mark | + | [[File:Andrea Mantegna 087.jpg|thumbnail|300px|Saint [[Mark]] |
| − | <br />
| |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| | Artist: Andrea Mantegna]] | | Artist: Andrea Mantegna]] |
| − | The '''Gospel according to Mark''', or simply the '''Gospel of Mark''', is a bold and irreverent account by an outsider eyewitness who had a youthful enthusiasm and charm, including clever references to himself. Its style is anti-[[Establishment]] with simple wit, containing a direct, easy-to-understand explanation of the teachings, miracles, and [[Passion]] of [[Jesus]], emphasizing [[faith]] and deeds. It was written by [[Mark]], seeing the events as an impressionable, [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|open-minded]] young boy, who subsequently was the first to publish, without [[Apostles]]' approval.<ref>"Markan priority" is the term used to describe the nearly universal acceptance today that this was the first chronologically among [[the Gospels]].</ref> The Gospel of Mark begins and ends abruptly, makes no mention of [[St. Joseph|Joseph]], and omits the post-[[Resurrection]] gatherings by [[the Apostles]] who met without him. The shortest [[Gospels|Gospel]] at only 14,949 words,<ref name="holyword.church">https://holyword.church/miscellaneous-resources/how-many-words-in-each-book-of-the-bible/</ref> this can be read easily in merely one hour.<ref>Adults read silently at about 238 words per minute, and aloud at about 183 words per minute. [https://scholarwithin.com/average-reading-speed#:~:text=Adult%20Average%20Reading%20Speed,-It%20has%20been&text=Silent%20reading%20adults%20average%20238,average%20183%20words%20per%20minute.]</ref> | + | The '''Gospel of Mark''' is a bold eyewitness account that focuses on [[Jesus Christ|Jesus]]. [[Theology|Theological]] themes of the Gospel of Mark are: [[Jesus Christ]] as the [[Son of God]] and [[Messiah]], the [[kingdom of God]], [[Christianity|Christian]] [[discipleship]], [[salvation]] for all, and [[atonement]].<ref>[https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/is-marks-gospel-theological-these-7-themes-affirm-it-is#:~:text=Garland%20outlines%204%20key%20aspects,nations%20to%20faith%20and%20confession. Is Mark's Gospel 'Theological'? These 7 Themes Affirm It Is!], Zondervan Academic</ref> This gospel highlights the [[miracles]] Jesus performed and the immense importance of [[faith]].<ref>[https://bibleproject.com/articles/mark-gospel-servant-messiah/#:~:text=In%20summary%2C%20Mark's%20Gospel%20is,faith%20and%20cross%2Dbearing%20discipleship. Mark: The Gospel of the Servant-Messiah], BibleProject.com</ref><ref>[https://enterthebible.org/courses/mark/lessons/theological-themes-in-mark Theological themes of Mark]</ref><ref>[https://biblehub.com/q/main_themes_in_gospel_of_mark.htm#:~:text=Through%20its%20vivid%20portrayal%2C%20the,faith%2C%20and%20a%20transformed%20life. Main themes in Gospel of Mark], BibleHub.com</ref> The Gospel of Mark '''''bluntly criticizes the elite''''' and their practices. |
| | + | |
| | + | '''''The Gospel of Mark is the most corroborated testimony in all of history''''', as the independent eyewitness [[Matthew]] incorporated nearly all of it into his own [[Gospel of Matthew]], and [[John the Apostle]] independently corroborates much also.<ref>[[Mark]], [[Matthew the Apostle|Matthew]], and [[John the Apostle|John]] likely had different, rivaling ethnicities, which reinforces the significance of their corroboration of each other's eyewitness accounts.</ref> Mark preceded both, in knowing and following Jesus.<ref>Mark describes, as an eyewitness, the calling of John to be an [[Apostle]] at {{bibleref|Mark|1|19-20}}, and Mark records Jesus calling Matthew ("Levi") as an Apostle while the [[Gospel of Matthew]] never uses his old name. {{bible ref|Mark|2|14}} Matthew is the corresponding Greek equivalent for the Hebrew name Levi.</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | '''''The Gospel of Mark is the most corroborated testimony in all of [[Scriptures]] and recorded history''''', as the independent eyewitness [[Matthew]] incorporated nearly all of it into his own [[Gospel of Matthew]], and [[John the Apostle]] corroborates much also. Mark preceded Matthew in following Jesus.<ref>Mark describes, as an eyewitness, the calling of Matthew (Levi) to be an Apostle; Mark records Jesus calling "Levi," while Matthew's Gospel never uses his old name. {{bible ref|Mark|2|14}} Matthew is the corresponding Greek equivalent for the Hebrew name Levi.</ref>
| + | The Gospel of Mark has youthful enthusiasm and charm, including clever hidden references to the author himself. Its style is anti-[[establishment]] with simple wit, containing a direct, easy-to-understand explanation of the teachings, miracles, and [[Passion]] of [[Jesus]], emphasizing [[faith]] and deeds. It was written by [[Mark]], seeing the events as an impressionable, [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|open-minded]] young boy, who subsequently was the first to publish, without [[Apostles]]' approval.<ref>"Markan priority" is the term used to describe the nearly universal acceptance today that this was the first chronologically among [[the Gospels]].</ref> The Gospel of Mark begins and ends abruptly, makes no mention of [[St. Joseph|Joseph]], and omits the post-[[Resurrection]] gatherings by [[the Apostles]] who met without Mark. The shortest [[Gospels|Gospel]] at only 14,949 words,<ref name="holyword.church">https://holyword.church/miscellaneous-resources/how-many-words-in-each-book-of-the-bible/</ref> this can be easily read in merely one hour.<ref>Adults read silently at about 238 words per minute, and aloud at about 183 words per minute. [https://scholarwithin.com/average-reading-speed#:~:text=Adult%20Average%20Reading%20Speed,-It%20has%20been&text=Silent%20reading%20adults%20average%20238,average%20183%20words%20per%20minute.]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | The Gospel of Mark is the original source for how and why [[John the Baptist]] was executed, while most [[Apostles]] (including [[John]]) apparently did not know the details. The [[Gospel of Matthew]] confirms [[Mark]]'s account but without all of the details. In addition, the Gospel of Mark was the first to say that all the [[Apostles]] abandoned [[Jesus]] at the beginning of the [[Passion]]. | | The Gospel of Mark is the original source for how and why [[John the Baptist]] was executed, while most [[Apostles]] (including [[John]]) apparently did not know the details. The [[Gospel of Matthew]] confirms [[Mark]]'s account but without all of the details. In addition, the Gospel of Mark was the first to say that all the [[Apostles]] abandoned [[Jesus]] at the beginning of the [[Passion]]. |
| | | | |
| − | The Gospel of Mark is bluntly critical of the elite and their practices:
| + | Unique insights in the Gospel of Mark include: |
| | * only the Gospel of Mark begins by boldly declaring that it is "the gospel of [[Jesus Christ]], the Son of [[God]]";<ref>{{bibleref|Mark|1|1|ver=ESV}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> | | * only the Gospel of Mark begins by boldly declaring that it is "the gospel of [[Jesus Christ]], the Son of [[God]]";<ref>{{bibleref|Mark|1|1|ver=ESV}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> |
| − | * only the Gospel of Mark refers to the "gospel of [[God]]," a phrase repeated by [[Paul]] and [[Peter]] in their letters which suggests they had heard Mark's account; | + | * only the Gospel of Mark refers to the "gospel of [[God]]," a phrase repeated by [[Paul]] and [[Peter]] in their letters, which suggests they had heard Mark's account; |
| − | * the Gospel of Mark portrays the disparagement as regional, rather than ethnic, in Jesus's reference to a Greek woman's daughter as a "dog" (better translated as "puppy") in {{bible ref|Mark|7|24-30}}, while the subsequent [[Gospel of Matthew]] retells the same story with an anti-[[Gentile]] ethnic connotation in {{bible ref|Matthew|15|21-28}}; | + | * the Gospel of Mark portrays a controversial disparagement as regional, rather than ethnic, in Jesus's reference to a Greek woman's daughter as a "dog" (better translated as "puppy") in {{bible ref|Mark|7|24-30}}, while the subsequent [[Gospel of Matthew]] retells the same story with an anti-[[Gentile]] ethnic connotation in {{bible ref|Matthew|15|21-28}}; |
| | * only the Gospel of Mark bluntly says that Jesus was a mere carpenter; | | * only the Gospel of Mark bluntly says that Jesus was a mere carpenter; |
| | * only Mark quotes Jesus as expressing dismay at [[the Apostles]] by saying, “Do you not understand this [[parable]]? How then will you understand all the parables?”<ref>{{bibleref|Mark|4|13|ver=ESV}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> | | * only Mark quotes Jesus as expressing dismay at [[the Apostles]] by saying, “Do you not understand this [[parable]]? How then will you understand all the parables?”<ref>{{bibleref|Mark|4|13|ver=ESV}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> |
| Line 25: |
Line 26: |
| | * the Gospel of Mark is the only one to include the parable about achievement without knowing how: The Parable of the Seed that Grows Itself ({{bible ref|Mark|4|26-29}}); | | * the Gospel of Mark is the only one to include the parable about achievement without knowing how: The Parable of the Seed that Grows Itself ({{bible ref|Mark|4|26-29}}); |
| | * the Gospel of Mark implies that it was other followers, not merely [[the Apostles]], who asked [[Jesus]] good questions (see {{bibleref|Mark|4|10}} - "And when he was alone, ''those present'' along with the Twelve questioned him about the parables."<ref>[[NASB]] quoted here (emphasis added).</ref>); and | | * the Gospel of Mark implies that it was other followers, not merely [[the Apostles]], who asked [[Jesus]] good questions (see {{bibleref|Mark|4|10}} - "And when he was alone, ''those present'' along with the Twelve questioned him about the parables."<ref>[[NASB]] quoted here (emphasis added).</ref>); and |
| − | * the Gospel of Mark coined the anti-[[Establishment]] term—the "Herodians"—which Mark used twice while Luke and John declined to use the term, and Matthew used the term only once in copying from Mark. | + | * the Gospel of Mark coined the anti-establishment term—the "Herodians"—which Mark used twice while Luke and John declined to use the term, and Matthew used the term only once in copying from Mark. |
| | | | |
| | Scientific testing confirmed that a recently discovered transcript from the Gospel of Mark dates from before A.D. 90, when Mark may have still been living given that he was merely a boy during the Ministry.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150325223910/https://earliestchristianity.wordpress.com/category/textual-criticism/ First-Century Mark Manuscript: More News?] (web.archive.org)</ref> Indeed, the earliest manuscripts of the Gospel of Mark (and the Gospel of Matthew) are estimated to be from A.D. 60s.<ref name="McCall">http://www.levitt.com/essays/language</ref> Those oldest manuscripts are in Greek, and no ancient manuscript of the Gospel of Mark or the Gospel of Matthew has ever been discovered in [[Aramaic]].<ref name="McCall"/> | | Scientific testing confirmed that a recently discovered transcript from the Gospel of Mark dates from before A.D. 90, when Mark may have still been living given that he was merely a boy during the Ministry.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150325223910/https://earliestchristianity.wordpress.com/category/textual-criticism/ First-Century Mark Manuscript: More News?] (web.archive.org)</ref> Indeed, the earliest manuscripts of the Gospel of Mark (and the Gospel of Matthew) are estimated to be from A.D. 60s.<ref name="McCall">http://www.levitt.com/essays/language</ref> Those oldest manuscripts are in Greek, and no ancient manuscript of the Gospel of Mark or the Gospel of Matthew has ever been discovered in [[Aramaic]].<ref name="McCall"/> |
| Line 58: |
Line 59: |
| | Numerous verses in the Gospel of Mark directly embarrass the Apostles, including Mark 4:13 (uniquely observing that Apostles didn't understand the parables); Mark 8:14-21 (the Apostles did not understand what Jesus was teaching); Mark 8:32–33 (Peter is disrespectful to Jesus); Mark 9:14–29 (Apostles were unable to perform miracles); Mark 9:33–34 (Apostles argue over who was the greatest among them); Mark 10:35–40 (several Apostles demand positions of honor); Mark 14:37 (Apostles fall asleep when Jesus asked them to watch for merely one hour); Mark 14:72 (Peter denies Jesus three times); Mark 14:50–52 (Apostles flee when Jesus was arrested).<ref name="rsc.byu.edu">https://rsc.byu.edu/vol-17-no-2-2016/marks-unique-contribution</ref> | | Numerous verses in the Gospel of Mark directly embarrass the Apostles, including Mark 4:13 (uniquely observing that Apostles didn't understand the parables); Mark 8:14-21 (the Apostles did not understand what Jesus was teaching); Mark 8:32–33 (Peter is disrespectful to Jesus); Mark 9:14–29 (Apostles were unable to perform miracles); Mark 9:33–34 (Apostles argue over who was the greatest among them); Mark 10:35–40 (several Apostles demand positions of honor); Mark 14:37 (Apostles fall asleep when Jesus asked them to watch for merely one hour); Mark 14:72 (Peter denies Jesus three times); Mark 14:50–52 (Apostles flee when Jesus was arrested).<ref name="rsc.byu.edu">https://rsc.byu.edu/vol-17-no-2-2016/marks-unique-contribution</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Mark does include the ostensibly harsh statement attributed to [[Jesus]] about [[Gentiles]], which is set forth at Mark 7:27–29 and Matthew 15:26–28. | + | Mark does include the ostensibly harsh statement attributed to [[Jesus]] about [[Gentiles]], which is set forth at {{bibleref|Mark|7|27–29}} and {{bibleref|Matthew|15|26–28}}. |
| | | | |
| | == Different use of the Old Testament == | | == Different use of the Old Testament == |
| Line 67: |
Line 68: |
| | | | |
| | === Date of Creation === | | === Date of Creation === |
| − | There is extensive debate over when the Gospel of Mark was written. [[Paul]] quoted from the Gospel of Mark during Paul's ministry at [[Antioch]] of Pisida in AD 48, ''see'' {{bibleref|Acts|13|25}},<ref>[https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/paul/timeline.cfm Timeline of Paul's ministry.]</ref> so the Gospel of Mark was written and circulated well before then. | + | There is extensive debate over when the Gospel of Mark was written. [[Paul]] quoted from the Gospel of Mark during Paul's ministry at [[Antioch]] of Pisida in AD 48, ''see'' {{bibleref|Acts|13|25}},<ref>[https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/paul/timeline.cfm Timeline of Paul's ministry.]</ref> so the Gospel of Mark was written and circulated well before AD 48. |
| | | | |
| | [[Liberal denial]] pushes for a later date, such as AD 70, while others say an early date is likely. A very expensive book available on [[Amazon.com]] as published in 2004 argues that "Mark's gospel was not written as late as c. 65-75 [AD], but dates from sometime between the late 30s and early 40s [AD]."<ref>https://www.amazon.com/Date-Marks-Gospel-Christianity-Testament/dp/0567081958#:~:text=Book%20details&text=This%20book%20argues%20that%20Mark's,30s%20and%20early%2040s%20CE.</ref> Other scholars argue as follows: | | [[Liberal denial]] pushes for a later date, such as AD 70, while others say an early date is likely. A very expensive book available on [[Amazon.com]] as published in 2004 argues that "Mark's gospel was not written as late as c. 65-75 [AD], but dates from sometime between the late 30s and early 40s [AD]."<ref>https://www.amazon.com/Date-Marks-Gospel-Christianity-Testament/dp/0567081958#:~:text=Book%20details&text=This%20book%20argues%20that%20Mark's,30s%20and%20early%2040s%20CE.</ref> Other scholars argue as follows: |
| Line 75: |
Line 76: |
| | https://bible.org/seriespage/mark-introduction-argument-and-outline | | https://bible.org/seriespage/mark-introduction-argument-and-outline |
| | | | |
| − | Addendum: Other scholars for early dating of Mark: | + | Addendum: Other scholars supporting an early date for the Gospel of Mark: |
| | | | |
| | John Wenham, in his book, Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke, puts the Gospel of Mark at 45 AD. | | John Wenham, in his book, Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke, puts the Gospel of Mark at 45 AD. |
| | | | |
| − | John A. T. Robinson, put the Gospel of Mark also at 45 AD, and makes the case for all of the [[New Testament]] having been written before 70 AD, in his famous book, Redating the New Testament.<ref>https://apologeticsandagape.wordpress.com/2014/08/14/early-dating-for-the-gospel-according-to-mark/</ref>}} | + | John A. T. Robinson, who also estimates 45 AD as the date of the Gospel of Mark, makes the case for all of the [[New Testament]] having been written before 70 AD in his famous book, R''edating the New Testament''.<ref>https://apologeticsandagape.wordpress.com/2014/08/14/early-dating-for-the-gospel-according-to-mark/</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| | === Opening and Ending === | | === Opening and Ending === |
| | + | [[File:Accademia - St John the Baptist by Titian Cat314.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Saint [[John the Baptist]], a 1540 painting by Titian]] |
| | The first sentence of the Gospel of Mark constituted [[blasphemy]] under Jewish law punishable by death, and he was imprecise in describing Jewish custom, indicating that its author was likely a Gentile. | | The first sentence of the Gospel of Mark constituted [[blasphemy]] under Jewish law punishable by death, and he was imprecise in describing Jewish custom, indicating that its author was likely a Gentile. |
| | | | |
| − | This Second [[Gospel]] is mainly concerned with the [[Galilean]] ministry of [[Christ]], and the circumstances during the last week at [[Jerusalem]]. It begins with [[Christ|Jesus']] [[baptism]] and temptation. The main portion of the Gospel concerns the public ministry, [[Passion of Christ|Passion]], [[death]], and [[Resurrection]] of Jesus. | + | This Second [[Gospel]] is mainly concerned with the [[Galilean]] ministry of [[Christ]], and the circumstances during the last week at [[Jerusalem]]. It begins with [[Christ|Jesus']] [[baptism]] and temptation. The main portion of the Gospel concerns the public ministry, [[Passion of Christ|Passion]], [[death]], and [[Resurrection]] of Jesus. |
| | | | |
| | === More Concise === | | === More Concise === |
| − | Mark doesn't mention certain events mentioned by the other Synoptic Gospels. The genealogies, the birth story of Jesus, and the birth story of [[John the Baptist]], are all not included in favor of getting right into the adult stage, beginning with John the Baptist preparing the way for the savior. | + | |
| | + | ''See also:'' [[John the Baptist]] and [[Virgin birth]] |
| | + | |
| | + | Mark doesn't mention certain events mentioned by the other Synoptic Gospels. The [[Genealogy|genealogies]], the [[Virgin birth|birth story of Jesus]], and the birth story of [[John the Baptist]], are all not included in favor of getting right into the adult stage, beginning with John the Baptist preparing the way for the savior. |
| | | | |
| | === Content === | | === Content === |
| − | Mark is much more concerned with Christ's acts than with His teachings, though two of these teachings 4:3–32 and 13:5–37 are fairly long. The miracles take up almost 25% of the Gospel. This impresses upon the reader Christ's almighty power and dominion over all physical laws. The first chapter shows three miracles: the casting out of an unclean spirit, the cure of [[Peter]]'s mother-in-law, and the healing of a [[leper]]. Eighteen miracles are recorded and all but three occur in the first eight chapters. Only two of these miracles (7: 31–37 and 8:22–26) are peculiar to Mark. Mark, however, shows details not found in the other Synoptics. Mark has only four parables: the sower (4:3–9), the seed growing secretly (4:26–29), the mustard seed (4:30–32), and the wicked husbandman (12:1–9). The second is found only in Mark. | + | Mark is much more concerned with Christ's acts than with His teachings, though two of these teachings 4:3–32 and 13:5–37 are fairly long. The miracles take up almost 25% of the Gospel. This impresses upon the reader Christ's almighty power and dominion over all physical laws. The first chapter shows three miracles: the casting out of an unclean spirit, the cure of [[Peter]]'s mother-in-law, and the healing of a [[leper]]. Eighteen miracles are recorded and all but three occur in the first eight chapters. Only two of these miracles (7:31–37 and 8:22–26) are peculiar to Mark. Mark, however, shows details not found in the other Synoptics. Mark has only four parables: the sower (4:3–9), the seed growing secretly (4:26–29), the mustard seed (4:30–32), and the wicked husbandman (12:1–9). The second is found only in Mark. |
| | | | |
| | Mark gives a face to the human feelings and emotions of Christ. The frailties of the apostles are much more graphic than in the parallel narratives contained in the other two synoptic Gospels. | | Mark gives a face to the human feelings and emotions of Christ. The frailties of the apostles are much more graphic than in the parallel narratives contained in the other two synoptic Gospels. |
| | | | |
| − | There are issues with the [[Mark ending|ending of Mark]]. The earliest manuscripts do not have {{bible ref|Mark|16|9–20}}, a section of scripture that puts forth ideas that aren't found in the other gospels. Current thinking is that Mark 16:9–20 is a later addition and that the Gospel either ends with 16:8 or with an original ending that is now lost. This is considered a [[Deuterocanonicals|Deuterocanonical]] part of the Gospel. | + | There are issues with the [[Mark ending|ending of Mark]]. The earliest manuscripts do not contain {{bible ref|Mark|16|9–20}}, a section of scripture that presents ideas not found in the other Gospels. The current thinking is that Mark 16:9–20 is a later addition and that the Gospel either ends with 16:8 or with an original ending that is now lost. This is considered a [[Deuterocanonicals|Deuterocanonical]] part of the Gospel. |
| | | | |
| | Mark is sometimes called a "three-act play," whereby its third act is its extensive account of the [[Passion]].<ref>https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1133&context=studiaantiqua (see its pdf p.4).</ref> | | Mark is sometimes called a "three-act play," whereby its third act is its extensive account of the [[Passion]].<ref>https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1133&context=studiaantiqua (see its pdf p.4).</ref> |
| Line 111: |
Line 116: |
| | | | |
| | ==Audience== | | ==Audience== |
| − | The audience is for Gentiles, and Mark may have been a Gentile himself as only he quotes Jesus noting the [[Sabbath]]'s application for all of mankind and not only Jews: Jesus said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.”<ref>Mark 2:27 ([[NASB]]).</ref> That is not found in any other Gospel.<ref name="rsc.byu.edu"/> Mark describes Aramaic words and Jewish customs that would not be necessary for a Jewish audience. Mark was probably not Jewish himself, as he overstates the hand-washing ritual in Mark 7:3<ref>https://biblehub.com/mark/7-3.htm</ref> by saying that "all the Jews" performed the ritual,<ref>http://www.logicandlight.org/busted-14-marks-error-regarding-jewish-handwashing-rituals/</ref> and his use of "the" suggests he did view himself as part of the group. | + | The audience is for [[Gentile]]s, and Mark may have been a Gentile himself as only he quotes Jesus noting the [[Sabbath]]'s application for all of mankind and not only Jews: Jesus said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.”<ref>Mark 2:27 ([[NASB]]).</ref> That is not found in any other Gospel.<ref name="rsc.byu.edu"/> Mark describes Aramaic words and Jewish customs that would not be necessary for a Jewish audience. Mark was probably not Jewish himself, as he overstates the hand-washing ritual in Mark 7:3<ref>https://biblehub.com/mark/7-3.htm</ref> by saying that "all the Jews" performed the ritual,<ref>http://www.logicandlight.org/busted-14-marks-error-regarding-jewish-handwashing-rituals/</ref> and his use of "the" suggests he did view himself as part of the group. |
| | | | |
| | Also, only Mark declares that all foods are clean to eat now (but the rationale does not include unclean [[vaccine|vaccination]]). See [[Mark 1-8 (Translated)#7:18|Mark 7:18-19]]. The other Gospels do not include this, and even the [[King James Version]] resists this by limiting the exemption to all meat. | | Also, only Mark declares that all foods are clean to eat now (but the rationale does not include unclean [[vaccine|vaccination]]). See [[Mark 1-8 (Translated)#7:18|Mark 7:18-19]]. The other Gospels do not include this, and even the [[King James Version]] resists this by limiting the exemption to all meat. |
| Line 129: |
Line 134: |
| | The Gospel of Mark contains only ten [[parables]], which is fewer than those contained by each of the other [[Synoptic Gospels]].<ref>https://www.agapebiblestudy.com/Mark_Gospel/Mark_Lesson_4.htm</ref> | | The Gospel of Mark contains only ten [[parables]], which is fewer than those contained by each of the other [[Synoptic Gospels]].<ref>https://www.agapebiblestudy.com/Mark_Gospel/Mark_Lesson_4.htm</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | The tenses used by [[Mark]] include the present tense, the imperfect, and the [[aorist]]. While other writers typically vary their use of a connecting particle, Mark does not and instead always uses the simplest one "kai", meaning "and".<ref>https://blog.adw.org/2019/07/new-translation-marks-gospel/</ref> Ancient Greek did not have punctuation to end sentences, and thus connecting participles were often used. | + | The tenses used by [[Mark]] include the present tense, the imperfect, and the [[aorist]]. While other writers typically vary their use of a connecting particle, Mark does not and instead always uses the simplest one "kai", meaning "and".<ref>https://blog.adw.org/2019/07/new-translation-marks-gospel/</ref> Ancient Greek did not have punctuation to end sentences, and thus connecting particles were often used. |
| | | | |
| | + | The Gospel of Mark uses more [[Latin]] words, transliterated into [[Greek]], than any other Gospel.<ref>https://btsfreeccm.org/local/lmp/lessons.php?lesson=GOS3text#:~:text=A%20third%20detail%20that%20points,spoken%20in%20the%20Mediterranean%20world.</ref> |
| | === Mark's Greek === | | === Mark's Greek === |
| | | | |
| | Particular characteristics of Mark's Greek include the following:<ref>Citing Ben Witherington in ''The Gospel of Mark: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary'' (pp. 18-9) [https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/2021/what-evidence-suggests-that-greek-was-not-marks-first-language].</ref> | | Particular characteristics of Mark's Greek include the following:<ref>Citing Ben Witherington in ''The Gospel of Mark: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary'' (pp. 18-9) [https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/2021/what-evidence-suggests-that-greek-was-not-marks-first-language].</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | *Use of historical present tense verbs | + | *Use of historical present-tense verbs |
| | *Use of first-person plural as the narrative | | *Use of first-person plural as the narrative |
| | *Use of a singular verb to follow an impersonal plural verb | | *Use of a singular verb to follow an impersonal plural verb |
| Line 154: |
Line 160: |
| | | | |
| | ==See also== | | ==See also== |
| | + | *[[Date of the Gospel of Mark]] |
| | *[[Gospel of Mark (Translated)]] | | *[[Gospel of Mark (Translated)]] |
| | *[[Mark ending]] | | *[[Mark ending]] |
| − | *[https://www.stjames.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/sermons/2021/01/The-Significance-of-the-Passion-Narrative-in-Mark.pdf Rev’d Murray Wills, "The Significance of the Passion Narrative in Mark’s Gospel," Seminar on Mark, St James’ Church (January 2021)] | + | *[[Mark Chapter 1|Mark Chapter 1 - for teaching phonics]] |
| − | *[https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1133&context=studiaantiqua Michael Biggerstaff, "The Lord's Supper: Exegesis of Mark 14:22-26" (April 2009)]
| |
| | | | |
| | == External links == | | == External links == |
| | | | |
| − | *[https://www.bibleref.com/Mark/survey-of-Mark.html Survey of the Gospel of Mark] | + | *[https://www.bibleref.com/Mark/survey-of-Mark.html Survey of the Gospel of Mark], Bibleref.com |
| | + | *[https://bibleproject.com/guides/book-of-mark/ The Book of Mark], Bible Project |
| | + | *[https://www.biblestudytools.com/esv/mark/ Gospel of Mark], Biblestudytools.com |
| | + | *[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA_e7d3643c-83aa-4de1-8930-66a3ddbbf37d Summary of Gospel of Luke: From a theologically conservative perspective] |
| | + | *[https://chatgpt.com/share/694f7038-f3e8-8003-94b5-8f25da7992ab A summary of Gospel of Luke: From a theologically conservative perspective] |
| | + | *[https://www.stjames.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/sermons/2021/01/The-Significance-of-the-Passion-Narrative-in-Mark.pdf Rev’d Murray Wills, "The Significance of the Passion Narrative in Mark’s Gospel," Seminar on Mark, St James’ Church (January 2021)] |
| | + | *[https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1133&context=studiaantiqua Michael Biggerstaff, "The Lord's Supper: Exegesis of Mark 14:22-26" (April 2009)] |
| | | | |
| | ==References== | | ==References== |
| Line 167: |
Line 179: |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Conservative Bible|*]] | | [[Category:Conservative Bible|*]] |
| | + | [[Category:New Testament]] |
| | [[Category:New Testament Books| nt2]] | | [[Category:New Testament Books| nt2]] |
| | [[Category:Gospels| nt2]] | | [[Category:Gospels| nt2]] |
| | {{New Testament Books}} | | {{New Testament Books}} |
| | {{Mark}} | | {{Mark}} |