Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gun"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Gun control, freedom, etc.)
(No difference)

Revision as of 03:24, July 7, 2007

Most of the first section seemed rather patronizing

The first two sentances are VERY patronizing.

'Some guns fire small bullets. Some guns fire big bullets. Some guns fire very big bullets'

Is this aimed at 5 year olds?! This could be a very good article with a little work. Jennisuk 22:08, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

Cut from first section:
... are tools generally designed for firing bullets in a controlled manner. They have traditionally been used for two purposes: firing bullets at people, and threatening to fire bullets at people. Thus, a gun is considered a weapon, though technically, the bullet is the weapon, unless the gun itself is used as a club, or as a spear if it has a bayonet attached.
Most of this is relevant to the gun control / gun ownership debate. I do hope we will present the conservative side of this and not only the liberal side. --Ed Poor 08:27, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

machineguns and 20mm+ heavy MGs are indirect fire weapons?! ROFLMAO i bet you don't even know what is indirect fire!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Schwarze (talk)

Jesus Christ is LORD!

That's wonderful, thank you for testifying. But what does that have to do with the article? Puzzled... Human 22:42, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

In the article it says MGs and 20MMs use indirect fire, read the article


Gun control, freedom, etc.

2/3 of this article is about freedom and gun control and blah blah political stuff. Is there another article where this can go, so this can focus on the basic encyclopedia stuff of what a gun is, how it works, how it was invented, etc.? AManInBlack 23:24, 6 July 2007 (EDT)