Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,005
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 401:
Line 401: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→NYT: Can the Right Confront Antisemitism in Its Ranks?
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/group/age/youth/cdc-hiv-youth-sex-700x698.png
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/group/age/youth/cdc-hiv-youth-sex-700x698.png
Daniel1212 05:33, November 24, 2021 (EST)
Daniel1212 05:33, November 24, 2021 (EST)
==See my newest Essay==
*[[Essay: Why a Conservapedian falling for a chatbot is like a man who is seduced by a corrupt 300 pound woman]].
==''[[NYT]]'': [https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000010529017/can-the-right-confront-antisemitism-in-its-ranks.html Can the Right Confront Antisemitism in Its Ranks?]==
[[File:True conservatives don't believe in the very liberal concept of hate crimes! Conservative (talk) 18 59, October 1 2025.PNG|center|850px|thumb|[[User:Conservative]] turned [[Conservapedia]] into a [[neo-Nazi]] [[fascist]] and [[antisemitic]] mouthpiece.]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 11:23, December 18, 2025 (EST)
:[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA_6015c7db-5036-43da-9bea-3a133104ad3e Why is it that many American conservatives don't believe in the concept of hate crimes?]
:'''Summary:''' "Many American conservatives oppose hate crime laws primarily because they view them as violating principles of equal justice under the law, punishing thought or motive rather than action alone, risking inconsistent or politicized enforcement, and potentially infringing on free speech—preferring instead that all violent crimes be prosecuted equally regardless of bias motivation."
:I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:38, December 18, 2025 (EST)
===User:Conservative added [[Heil Hitler]] to his user page===
[[File:1538852447 zagolovok.jpg|center|650px|thumb|[[Ukrainian nationalist]]s welcome [[Nazi]]s, 1941.<br>''Above in the [[Latin]] alphabet'': [[Heil Hitler]]! ''Below in the [[Cyrillic]] alphabet the salute in the collaborationist [[UPA]]'': Glory to the Heroes! - Slave Ukraini!]]
[[User:Conservative ]] added [[Slava Ukraine|Heil Hitler]] to his user page. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative&curid=180781&diff=2162492&oldid=2162491] https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/250641 When called out for it he deleted it.[[User:LT]] was just blocked infinitely for the same [[malicious]] intent.
He was told years ago about the [[Ukrainian Nationalist]] salute. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative&action=rollback&from=Conservative&token=7f9ef5536dff44b6e2ca9eedfe237381%2B%5C] For this reason he's been [[Topic ban]]ned from international politics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 17:08, September 27, 2025 (EDT)
:Untrue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:41, September 27, 2025 (EDT)
::It is true. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative&action=rollback&from=Conservative&token=7f9ef5536dff44b6e2ca9eedfe237381%2B%5C] [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/LT User:LT was blocked infinitely] for the same [[malice|malicious intent]].
::Need the timeline? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:48, September 27, 2025 (EDT)
::[[User:Conservative]] and I personally discussed this exact terminology more than 3 years ago, both on the [[wiki]] and on the phone. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 19:08, September 27, 2025 (EDT)
::[https://www.bitchute.com/video/9ttm23dLLNbU/ Watch what happens when the NATO-backed soldier gives the official Nazi greeting, "Slava Ukraine" (Heil Hitler)]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 18:49, October 5, 2025 (EDT)
Andy, this just appeared on my autofeed on my phone: [https://paw.princeton.edu/article/moment-andrew-schlafly-81-conservapedia A moment with ... Andrew Schlafly '81, on 'Conservapedia'] paw.princeton.edu
Andy Schlafly: "[[Conservatism]] is an approach that adheres to [[original intent]] in interpreting older documents..."
To say the documented [[original intent]] of Russian, Ukrainian, and other [[Eastern European]] [[society|societies]] about the original meaning and current usage of [[Slava Ukraine]] in schools, academia, [[culture]]s and current usage is "far fetched" makes one sound like a [[liberal]] Supreme Court Justice.
Here's the thing about [[original intent]]: to understand original intent, one must ''unlearn'' many inbuilt [[bias]]es and re-definitions accumulated over time. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:26, November 21, 2025 (EST)
[[File:Slava Ukraine.PNG|center|850px|thumb|August 16, 2018.]]
{{Cquote|In the mythology of Ukraine, along with the myths about the "great past", there are legends aimed at distorting the truth about the shameful pages of the formation of the ukronacist ideology. A vivid example of this is the desire to hide and whitewash the Nazi essence of the slogan "Glory to Ukraine! Glory to the Heroes!"|||[https://en.topwar.ru/147996-mify-o-proishozhdenii-ukrainy-i-ukraincev-mif-9-slava-ukraine-gerojam-slava-heil-hitler-sieg-heil.html Myths about the origin of Ukraine and the Ukrainians. Myth 9. "Glory to Ukraine! Glory to heroes!"], October 8, 2018,}}
:Link to [[Ukrainian Nationalist]] directly. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:40, September 27, 2025 (EDT)
:Note: None of this is new to [[User:Conservative]]. It was presented to him in detail in the spring 2022, where he changed his mind and admitted to the [[fact]] that [[Nazi]]s served under [[Zelensky]]. His actions have been [[malicious]], targeting specific users with offensive postings, and deserve the same treatment [[User:LT]] got.
::[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA_55d52f62-1a20-4b0a-baa8-1a417dfb1f8e Is the term "Slava Ukraini" a Nazi phrase or is it anti-semitic? Give a summary statement.]: "No, the term "Slava Ukraini" ("Glory to Ukraine") is not a Nazi phrase, nor is it anti-Semitic. It is a longstanding Ukrainian patriotic salute with roots in the 19th–early 20th century national movement, predating fascism and Nazism... Claims labeling it as inherently Nazi largely stem from Soviet-era and modern Russian propaganda aimed at discrediting Ukrainian nationalism and sovereignty." [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:38, December 18, 2025 (EST)
I have [[Topic ban]]ned [[User:Conservative]] in the [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User%3AConservative&diff=2162721&oldid=2162715 area of international affairs] for 6 months for repeated violations and [[trolling]]. It is his second offense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 22:39, September 27, 2025 (EDT)
===Should Conservapedia allow [[User:Conservative]] to create [[Essay:Jewish war crimes in Palestine]]?===
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia%3AAFD_Essay%3ARussian_war_crimes_in_Ukraine&diff=1990335&oldid=1990334]
Or should [[Conservapedia]] have written, enforceable [[community standards]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 07:28, December 18, 2025 (EST)
===No, [[Vladimir Putin]] is not controlled by the [[Muscovite Jewish Mafia]]===
[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2025&diff=prev&oldid=2178568 as User:Conservative and Russian Nazis imply].
==User:Conservative trolling==
[[File:Keynes.jpg|center|thumbnail|650px|[[Keynesian Economics]] was "the dominant [[economic]] paradigm from the 1940s to the 1970s."
It is associated with the ideas of the incompetent [[British]] economist and [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty|pedophile]] [[John Maynard Keynes]].<ref>
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]
*[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]]]
[[File:USA GNP growth from january 1947 to January 2023.jpg|650px|thumbnail|center|Chart of the growth of U.S. [[Gross National Product|GNP]] from January 1947 to January 2023.
<br />
<br />
[[User:Conservative]], an apologist for [[Biden]]ism & [[Keynesianism]], asserts "A great strength of the United States is its very consistent growth of its GNP over decades and its quick recovery the few times its GNP has gone down. See also [[Economic stimulus]].
<br />
<br />
The [[Vietnam war|Vietnam]] and [[Afghan war]]s occupy 30 of 57 years between 1964 and 2021.
<br />
<br />
Moral of the story: Military Keynesian can sustain [[GDP]] growth for years and years, yet it doesn't necessarily make the people more prosperous or even win [[war]]s.]]
*[Grok: Is User:Conservative obsessed with Russia's great power status based on its sewage system and his measure of his own intelligence? https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative
Analysis of Conservapedia User "Conservative"
Based on an examination of Conservapedia content and related discussions, the user "Conservative" (likely a long-time editor under that handle) does appear to have a notable fixation on Russia's infrastructure shortcomings—particularly its sewage system—as a metric for undermining claims of its "great power" status. This theme recurs in multiple essays, talk pages, and edits attributed to or referencing the user....
1. Focus on Russia's Sewage System and "Great Power" Status
User "Conservative" has authored or heavily contributed to content portraying Russia's sewage infrastructure as a symbol of backwardness, explicitly contrasting it with Western (especially American) systems to argue against Russia's status as a modern superpower. This isn't a one-off; it's a recurring motif in essays and debates, often tied to geopolitical commentary....
:Patterns in Talk Pages and Edits
::On User talk:Aschlafly (Conservapedia founder Andrew Schlafly's page), discussions reference the user repeatedly arguing that Russia's (and Greenland/Alaska's) harsh climates prevent comparable sewage systems to temperate Western nations, using this to "brainwash" Schlafly into moderating pro-Russia views....
2. Emphasis on Intelligence/IQ as a Measure of Superiority
The user is Conservapedia's most prolific contributor on topics like atheism, evolution, and related pseudoscientific debates, where IQ serves as a frequent benchmark for ideological validation. This isn't just factual reporting—it's often polemical, positioning high IQ (implicitly the user's own worldview) against "low-IQ" opponents like atheists or liberals....
:Self-Measurement Angle
::In broader Conservapedia context, the user's output (e.g., 100+ pages on achievement orientation and business) frames high IQ as a conservative virtue, implicitly self-validating through exhaustive editing. External analyses (e.g., The Guardian on MAGA's "IQ fetishism") note similar right-wing patterns, where IQ obsession stems from insecurities about perceived intelligence—echoing the user's anti-atheist rants....
Conclusion: Yes, with Nuances
User "Conservative" fixates on Russia's sewage woes as a quirky but persistent jab at its superpower pretensions, substantiated by dedicated essays and edit histories. Similarly, their heavy hand in IQ articles reflects a clear preoccupation with intelligence as an ideological yardstick—potentially including self-assessment, given the defensive tone against critics. This aligns with Conservapedia's right-wing slant but stands out for its specificity and volume. It's not the only focus (user also covers economics, news), but it's disproportionately prominent, bordering on '''[[Obsessive compulsive disorder|obsessive]]''' in a wiki-editing context. For deeper dives, the linked pages provide raw evidence.
[[Category:Essays]][[Category:Economics]]
[[Category:Rhetoric]][[Category:User:Conservative proven wrong]]