Difference between revisions of "Talk:Positive statement"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The point is that positive statements do not have to be true, they just have to be falsifiable. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 23:36, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | The point is that positive statements do not have to be true, they just have to be falsifiable. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 23:36, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ??? This article makes 2 different claims. It originally claims that positive statements ''make judgements'', then later says they are testable claims of fact. The examples given at the bottom are incompatible with the logic at the top. | ||
Latest revision as of 05:08, September 29, 2026
fish do not, to my knowledge, live in trees, perhaps this should be fixed
The point is that positive statements do not have to be true, they just have to be falsifiable. --CPAdmin1 23:36, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
??? This article makes 2 different claims. It originally claims that positive statements make judgements, then later says they are testable claims of fact. The examples given at the bottom are incompatible with the logic at the top.