Changes

*Rep. [[Hillary Schlotten]] [D, MI–03]

*Rep. [[Hillary Schlotten]] [D, MI–03]

*Rep. [[Bill Huizenga]] [R, MI–04]

*Rep. [[Bill Huizenga]] [R, MI–04]

*Rep. [[Tim Walberg ]] [R, MI–05]

*Rep. [[Tim Walberg]] [R, MI–05]

*Rep. [[Debbie Dingell ]] [D, MI–06]

*Rep. [[Debbie Dingell]] [D, MI–06]

*Rep. [[Tom Barrett]] [R, MI–07]

*Rep. [[Tom Barrett]] [R, MI–07]

*Rep. [[Kristen McDonald Rivet]] [D, MI–08]

*Rep. [[Kristen McDonald Rivet]] [D, MI–08]

*Rep. [[Haley Stevens]] [D, MI–11]

*Rep. [[Haley Stevens]] [D, MI–11]

*Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]] [D, MI–12]

*Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]] [D, MI–12]

*Rep. [[ Shri Thanedar ]] [D, MI–13]

*Rep. [[Shri Thanedar]] [D, MI–13]

==2020 election fraud==

==2020 election fraud==

[[File:2020-11-04.jpg|right|300px|thumb|]]

[[File:2020-11-04.jpg|right|300px|thumb]]

:{{See also|Michigan election fraud|Democrat election fraud|Biden Putsch}}

:{{See also|Michigan election fraud|Democrat election fraud|Biden Putsch}}

In October 2020, [[Judicial Watch]] released a study of Census Bureau population statistics and state voter registration data. The study found 105% more registered voters than people in Michigan.<ref>https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/new-jw-study-voter-registration/</ref>

In October 2020, [[Judicial Watch]] released a study of Census Bureau population statistics and state voter registration data. The study found 105% more registered voters than people in Michigan.<ref>https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/new-jw-study-voter-registration/</ref>

The election results for the primary weren't incorrect, said Jonathan Kinloch, a [[Democrat]] and one of the canvassing board's four members. But, he said, something had gone wrong in the process of tracking ballots precinct by precinct.

The election results for the primary weren't incorrect, said Jonathan Kinloch, a [[Democrat]] and one of the canvassing board's four members. But, he said, something had gone wrong in the process of tracking ballots precinct by precinct.

Having balanced precincts is particularly important in Michigan because precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted, according to state law. Instead, the original election results would stand.<ref>https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/20/benson-asked-investigate-detroit-perfect-storm-voting-problems/5616629002/</ref>

Having balanced precincts is particularly important in Michigan because precincts whose poll books don't match with ballots can't be recounted, according to state law. Instead, the original election results would stand.<ref>https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/20/benson-asked-investigate-detroit-perfect-storm-voting-problems/5616629002/</ref>

===Detroit/Wayne Count election fraud===

===Detroit/Wayne Count election fraud===

====Absent voter ballots were pre-dated====

====Absent voter ballots were pre-dated====

54. Jessica Connarn is an attorney who was acting as a Republican challenger at the TCF Center in Wayne County.  Jessica Connarn’s affidavit describes how an election poll worker told Jessica Connarn that the poll worker “was being told to change the date on ballots to reflect that the ballots were received on an earlier date.”  Jessica Connarn also provided a photograph of a note handed to her by the poll worker in

54. Jessica Connarn is an attorney who was acting as a Republican challenger at the TCF Center in Wayne County.  Jessica Connarn's affidavit describes how an election poll worker told Jessica Connarn that the poll worker “was being told to change the date on ballots to reflect that the ballots were received on an earlier date.”  Jessica Connarn also provided a photograph of a note handed to her by the poll worker in

which the poll worker indicated she (the poll worker) was instructed to change the date ballots were received.  Jessica Connarn’s affidavit demonstrates that poll workers in Wayne County were pre-dating absent voter ballots, so that absent voter ballots received

which the poll worker indicated she (the poll worker) was instructed to change the date ballots were received.  Jessica Connarn's affidavit demonstrates that poll workers in Wayne County were pre-dating absent voter ballots, so that absent voter ballots received

after 8:00 p.m. on Election Day could be counted.

after 8:00 p.m. on Election Day could be counted.

64. Wayne County used the same Dominion voting system tabulators as did Antrim County, and Wayne County tested only a single one of its vote tabulating machines before the election. The Trump campaign asked Wayne County to have an observer physically present to witness the process. See Exhibit 4. Wayne County denied the Trump campaign the opportunity to be physically present. Representatives of the Trump campaign did have the opportunity to watch a portion of the test of a single machine by Zoom video.

64. Wayne County used the same Dominion voting system tabulators as did Antrim County, and Wayne County tested only a single one of its vote tabulating machines before the election. The Trump campaign asked Wayne County to have an observer physically present to witness the process. See Exhibit 4. Wayne County denied the Trump campaign the opportunity to be physically present. Representatives of the Trump campaign did have the opportunity to watch a portion of the test of a single machine by Zoom video.

65. Tabulator issues occurred elsewhere in Michigan. In Oakland County, Democrat Melanie Hartman was wrongly declared the winner of the commissioner's race by a 104-vote margin. A computer issue at the Rochester Hills clerk’s office caused them to double-count some votes. After elections officials caught the error, Republican Adam Kochenderfer was declared the winner with 1,127 more votes than Hartman.<ref>https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/08/electionmisinformation-michigan-vote-antrim-county/6209693002/</ref>

65. Tabulator issues occurred elsewhere in Michigan. In Oakland County, Democrat Melanie Hartman was wrongly declared the winner of the commissioner's race by a 104-vote margin. A computer issue at the Rochester Hills clerk's office caused them to double-count some votes. After elections officials caught the error, Republican Adam Kochenderfer was declared the winner with 1,127 more votes than Hartman.<ref>https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/08/electionmisinformation-michigan-vote-antrim-county/6209693002/</ref>

66. These vote tabulator failures are a mechanical malfunction that, under MCL 168.831-168.839, requires a “special election” in the precincts affected.

66. These vote tabulator failures are a mechanical malfunction that, under MCL 168.831-168.839, requires a “special election” in the precincts affected.

67. Michigan’s Election Code, MCL 168.831-168.839, provides the board of canvassers shall order a special election as governed by those precincts affected by the defect or mechanical malfunction. The board of county canvassers “is responsible for resolving any claims that malfunctioning voting equipment or defective ballots may have affected the outcome of a vote on an office appearing on the ballot.” Michigan Manual for Boards of County Canvassers.

67. Michigan's Election Code, MCL 168.831-168.839, provides the board of canvassers shall order a special election as governed by those precincts affected by the defect or mechanical malfunction. The board of county canvassers “is responsible for resolving any claims that malfunctioning voting equipment or defective ballots may have affected the outcome of a vote on an office appearing on the ballot.” Michigan Manual for Boards of County Canvassers.

====The canvassing process in Michigan====

====The canvassing process in Michigan====

73. The federal provisions governing the appointment of electors to the [[Electoral College]], 3 U.S.C. 1-18, require Michigan [[Governor Whitmer]] to prepare a Certificate of Ascertainment by December 14, the date the Electoral College meets.

73. The federal provisions governing the appointment of electors to the [[Electoral College]], 3 U.S.C. 1–18, require Michigan [[Governor Whitmer]] to prepare a Certificate of Ascertainment by December 14, the date the Electoral College meets.

74. The United States Code (3 U.S.C. 5) provides that if election results are contested in any state, and if the state, prior to election day, has enacted procedures to settle controversies or contests over electors and electoral votes, and if these procedures have been applied, and the results have been determined six days before the electors’ meetings, then these results are considered to be conclusive and will apply in the counting of the electoral votes. This date (the “Safe Harbor” deadline) falls on December 8, 2020. The governor of any state where there was a contest, and in which the contest was decided according to established state procedures, is required (by 3 U.S.C. 6) to send a certificate describing the form and manner by which the determination was made to the Archivist as soon as practicable.

74. The United States Code (3 U.S.C. 5) provides that if election results are contested in any state, and if the state, prior to election day, has enacted procedures to settle controversies or contests over electors and electoral votes, and if these procedures have been applied, and the results have been determined six days before the electors’ meetings, then these results are considered to be conclusive and will apply in the counting of the electoral votes. This date (the “Safe Harbor” deadline) falls on December 8, 2020. The governor of any state where there was a contest, and in which the contest was decided according to established state procedures, is required (by 3 U.S.C. 6) to send a certificate describing the form and manner by which the determination was made to the Archivist as soon as practicable.

====COUNT I - Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution and the corollary clause of Michigan’s Constitution====

====COUNT I - Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution and the corollary clause of Michigan’s Constitution====

Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the United States Constitution and the corollary clause of Michigan’s Constitution.

Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the United States Constitution and the corollary clause of Michigan's Constitution.

76. The [[Fourteenth Amendment]] to the United States Constitution provides “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” See also

76. The [[Fourteenth Amendment]] to the United States Constitution provides “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” See also

''[[Bush v. Gore]]'', 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000) (“Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.”); ''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections'', 383 U.S. 663, 665, (1966) (“Once the franchise is granted to the electorate, lines may not be drawn which are inconsistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”).

''[[Bush v. Gore]]'', 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000) (“Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.”); ''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections'', 383 U.S. 663, 665, (1966) (“Once the franchise is granted to the electorate, lines may not be drawn which are inconsistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”).

77. Wayne County’s failure to allow challengers and its counting of ineligible and illegal ballots that did not comply with the Michigan Election Code diluted the lawful ballots of these plaintiffs and of other Michigan voters and electors in violation of the United States Constitution and the Michigan Constitution guarantee of equal protection.

77. Wayne County's failure to allow challengers and its counting of ineligible and illegal ballots that did not comply with the Michigan Election Code diluted the lawful ballots of these plaintiffs and of other Michigan voters and electors in violation of the United States Constitution and the Michigan Constitution guarantee of equal protection.

78. [[President Trump]]’s campaign committee and these Michigan voters and challengers seek declaratory and injunctive relief requiring Secretary Benson to direct that Wayne County allow a reasonable number of challengers to meaningfully observe the conduct of the Wayne County board of county canvassers and the board of state canvassers and that these canvassing boards exercise their duty and authority under Michigan law, which forbids certifying a tally that includes any ballots that were not legally cast.

78. [[President Trump]]’s campaign committee and these Michigan voters and challengers seek declaratory and injunctive relief requiring Secretary Benson to direct that Wayne County allow a reasonable number of challengers to meaningfully observe the conduct of the Wayne County board of county canvassers and the board of state canvassers and that these canvassing boards exercise their duty and authority under Michigan law, which forbids certifying a tally that includes any ballots that were not legally cast.

79. In addition, President Trump’s campaign committee and these Michigan voters and challengers ask this Court to order that no ballot processed by a counting board in Wayne County can be included in the final vote tally unless a challenger was allowed to meaningfully observe the process and the handling and counting of the ballot.

79. In addition, President Trump’s campaign committee and these Michigan voters and challengers ask this Court to order that no ballot processed by a counting board in Wayne County can be included in the final vote tally unless a challenger was allowed to meaningfully observe the process and the handling and counting of the ballot.

80. Secretary Benson violated these Michigan voters’ right to equal protection by allowing Wayne County to process and count ballots in a manner that allowed ineligible ballots to be counted and by not requiring Wayne County to conduct the general election in a uniform manner as required by Michigan’s Election Code as was done in other jurisdictions.

80. Secretary Benson violated these Michigan voters’ right to equal protection by allowing Wayne County to process and count ballots in a manner that allowed ineligible ballots to be counted and by not requiring Wayne County to conduct the general election in a uniform manner as required by Michigan's Election Code as was done in other jurisdictions.

====COUNT II - Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated the rights of these Michigan voters under the federal Elections and Electors Clauses.====

====COUNT II - Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated the rights of these Michigan voters under the federal Elections and Electors Clauses.====

83. Michigan statutes enacted by the legislature protect the purity and integrity of elections by allowing ballot challengers to monitor the counting and processing of absentee ballots. Wayne County and Secretary Benson violated this statutory guarantee by preventing Republican challengers from meaningfully observing and participating in the ballot processing and counting process as is provided by MCL 168.730-736.

83. Michigan statutes enacted by the legislature protect the purity and integrity of elections by allowing ballot challengers to monitor the counting and processing of absentee ballots. Wayne County and Secretary Benson violated this statutory guarantee by preventing Republican challengers from meaningfully observing and participating in the ballot processing and counting process as is provided by MCL 168.730-736.

84. It is a violation of the rights of President Trump’s campaign committee to have federal elections for presidential electors governed under rules prescribed by the state legislature for Secretary Benson and Wayne County to count ballots that are not lawfully cast, and it is a violation of Michigan law for the Wayne County board of county canvassers and the Michigan board of state canvassers to certify an election tally that includes ineligible or unlawfully cast ballots.

84. It is a violation of the rights of President Trump's campaign committee to have federal elections for presidential electors governed under rules prescribed by the state legislature for Secretary Benson and Wayne County to count ballots that are not lawfully cast, and it is a violation of Michigan law for the Wayne County board of county canvassers and the Michigan board of state canvassers to certify an election tally that includes ineligible or unlawfully cast ballots.

====COUNT III - Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated Michigan’s Election Code====

====COUNT III - Secretary of State Benson and Wayne County violated Michigan’s Election Code====

86. Secretary of State Benson and the election officials in Wayne County violated MCL 168.730-168.734 by denying Republican challengers’ rights to meaningfully observe and participate in the ballot processing and counting process..

86. Secretary of State Benson and the election officials in Wayne County violated MCL 168.730-168.734 by denying Republican challengers’ rights to meaningfully observe and participate in the ballot processing and counting process..

88. Wayne County’s and Secretary Benson’s denial of Republican challengers’ right to participate and observe the processing of ballots violates Michigan’s Election Code and results in the casting and counting of ballots that were ineligible to be counted and diluted or canceled out the lawfully cast ballots of other Michigan voters.

88. Wayne County's and Secretary Benson's denial of Republican challengers’ right to participate and observe the processing of ballots violates Michigan's Election Code and results in the casting and counting of ballots that were ineligible to be counted and diluted or canceled out the lawfully cast ballots of other Michigan voters.

====PRAYER FOR RELIEF====

====PRAYER FOR RELIEF====

President Trump’s and [[Vice President Pence]]’s campaign committee and these Michigan citizens and voters ask this Court to enter a [[declaratory judgment]] in their favor as set forth in the foregoing counts and to grant the following injunctive relief:

President Trump's and [[Vice President Pence]]’s campaign committee and these Michigan citizens and voters ask this Court to enter a [[declaratory judgment]] in their favor as set forth in the foregoing counts and to grant the following injunctive relief:

A. An order directing Secretary Benson and the Michigan Board of State Canvassers to not certify the election results until they have verified and confirmed that all ballots that were tabulated and included in the final reported election results were cast in compliance with the provisions of the Michigan Election Code as set forth herein.

A. An order directing Secretary Benson and the Michigan Board of State Canvassers to not certify the election results until they have verified and confirmed that all ballots that were tabulated and included in the final reported election results were cast in compliance with the provisions of the Michigan Election Code as set forth herein.

levels to every 1 new Trump voter in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 2.54 additional new voters per Trump voter for Oakland County.  

levels to every 1 new Trump voter in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 2.54 additional new voters per Trump voter for Oakland County.  

Based on these statistically anomalous results that occurred in a handful of townships in these two counties, Dr. Quinell’s model determined that there were 40,771 anomalous votes in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 46,125 anomalous votes in Oakland County, for a total of nearly 87,000 anomalous votes or approximately 65% of Biden’s purported lead in Michigan.

Based on these statistically anomalous results that occurred in a handful of townships in these two counties, Dr. Quinell's model determined that there were 40,771 anomalous votes in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 46,125 anomalous votes in Oakland County, for a total of nearly 87,000 anomalous votes or approximately 65% of Biden's purported lead in Michigan.

The expert witness testimony of Russell James Ramsland, Jr. identified an event that occurred in Michigan on November 4, 2020, that is “physically impossible”.  The “event" reflected in the data is “4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined

The expert witness testimony of Russell James Ramsland Jr. identified an event that occurred in Michigan on November 4, 2020, that is “physically impossible”.  The “event" reflected in the data is “4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined

interval of 2 hour[s] and 38 minutes” for four precincts/townships in four Michigan counties (Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, and Kent).  Based on Mr. Ramsland’s analysis of the voting machines available at the referenced locations, he determined that the maximum processing capability during this period was only 94,867 ballots, so “there were 289,866 more ballots processed in the time available for processing in the four precincts/townships, than there was processing capacity.”  This amount is alone is nearly twice the number of ballots by which Biden purportedly leads President Trump (i.e., approximately 154,180).

interval of 2 hour[s] and 38 minutes” for four precincts/townships in four Michigan counties (Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, and Kent).  Based on Mr. Ramsland's analysis of the voting machines available at the referenced locations, he determined that the maximum processing capability during this period was only 94,867 ballots, so “there were 289,866 more ballots processed in the time available for processing in the four precincts/townships, than there was processing capacity.”  This amount is alone is nearly twice the number of ballots by which Biden purportedly leads President Trump (i.e., approximately 154,180).

===Ballot dump===

===Ballot dump===

In an October 2020 interview with ABC 7 News, Winfrey set the stage to drag out the process:

In an October 2020 interview with ABC 7 News, Winfrey set the stage to drag out the process:

{{quotebox-float|“We’re back in control, and we know that we will have nearly 10,000 poll workers that will be working with us to process ballots on election day, or election week is what we’re calling it now, because we know we’re going to be slow.”}}

{{quotebox-float|“We’re back in control, and we know that we will have nearly 10,000 poll workers that will be working with us to process ballots on election day, or election week is what we’re calling it now, because we know we’re going to be slow.”}}

[[President Donald Trump]] had a sizable lead.  Then suddenly [[Joe Biden]] jumped up 200,000 votes.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/voter-fraud-michigan-massive-dump-200000-ballots-biden-sudden-show-overnight/</ref><ref>https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/alert-michigan-county-removes-totals-following-report-of-skewed-results/</ref>  The Trump campaign, as well as the U.S. Senate campaign of GOP businessman and Iraq war veteran [[John James]], accused Michigan election officials of chicanery after thousands of ballots appeared in the middle of the night following Election Day. The campaigns also were outraged that GOP election observers were denied access to a ballot counting facility in Detroit after poll workers placed large sheets of cardboard over windows, obscuring the public’s view.

[[President Donald Trump]] had a sizable lead.  Then suddenly [[Joe Biden]] jumped up 200,000 votes.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/voter-fraud-michigan-massive-dump-200000-ballots-biden-sudden-show-overnight/</ref><ref>https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/alert-michigan-county-removes-totals-following-report-of-skewed-results/</ref>  The Trump campaign, as well as the U.S. Senate campaign of GOP businessman and Iraq war veteran [[John James]], accused Michigan election officials of chicanery after thousands of ballots appeared in the middle of the night following Election Day. The campaigns also were outraged that GOP election observers were denied access to a ballot counting facility in Detroit after poll workers placed large sheets of cardboard over windows, obscuring the public's view.

===No down ballot voting===

===No down ballot voting===

An observer noticed something curious about some of the names on the ballots.  Upon further review, one particular name out of the list, and confirmed to have cast a ballot,<ref>https://theredelephants.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/HxGKud6M7W3Zeg5A.mp4?_=3</ref> happened to be born in 1902 and passed away in 1984.  A pollster noticed the list and video, and used [[social security]] death index data confirming the deceased registered voter.  Over 14,000 dead people were found who either voted in Wayne County (Detroit) or were registered to vote.  Another poll watcher who was later kicked out for taking photographs, noticed a decent-sized list of Michigan residents who have also been confirmed to have cast their ballots.  All of the names on the list he reviewed show their birthdate in chronological order.<ref>https://theredelephants.com/there-is-undeniable-mathematical-evidence-the-election-is-being-stolen/</ref>

An observer noticed something curious about some of the names on the ballots.  Upon further review, one particular name out of the list, and confirmed to have cast a ballot,<ref>https://theredelephants.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/HxGKud6M7W3Zeg5A.mp4?_=3</ref> happened to be born in 1902 and passed away in 1984.  A pollster noticed the list and video, and used [[social security]] death index data confirming the deceased registered voter.  Over 14,000 dead people were found who either voted in Wayne County (Detroit) or were registered to vote.  Another poll watcher who was later kicked out for taking photographs, noticed a decent-sized list of Michigan residents who have also been confirmed to have cast their ballots.  All of the names on the list he reviewed show their birthdate in chronological order.<ref>https://theredelephants.com/there-is-undeniable-mathematical-evidence-the-election-is-being-stolen/</ref>

The campaigns also were outraged that GOP election observers were denied access to ballot counting facility in Detroit after poll workers placed large sheets of cardboard over windows, obscuring the public’s view.  Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel asked state residents to stop telling her staff to shove Sharpie markers up their butts after a state judge threw out a lawsuit by the Trump campaign which sought to halt ballot counts.  Nessel tweeted:

The campaigns also were outraged that GOP election observers were denied access to ballot counting facility in Detroit after poll workers placed large sheets of cardboard over windows, obscuring the public's view.  Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel asked state residents to stop telling her staff to shove Sharpie markers up their butts after a state judge threw out a lawsuit by the Trump campaign which sought to halt ballot counts.  Nessel tweeted:

{{quotebox-float|“Dear members of the public: Please stop making harassing & threatening calls to my staff.  They are kind, hardworking public servants just doing their job. Asking them to shove sharpies in uncomfortable places is never appropriate & is a sad commentary on the state of our nation."<ref>https://twitter.com/dananessel/status/1324441365091131394</ref>}}

{{quotebox-float|“Dear members of the public: Please stop making harassing & threatening calls to my staff.  They are kind, hardworking public servants just doing their job. Asking them to shove sharpies in uncomfortable places is never appropriate & is a sad commentary on the state of our nation."<ref>https://twitter.com/dananessel/status/1324441365091131394</ref>}}

The Sharpie reference is tied to allegations of poll irregularities contained in an [[Arizona]] lawsuit alleging that ballots marked with the felt-tipped pens were rejected at some voting centers.  In one video posted to [[social media]], two women claimed that Sharpie-marked ballots were not being accepted but ballots marked with regular ballpoint pens were at one voting station.  “So, they’re invalidating votes is what they’re doing,” a man off-camera taking the video says.  “Yes,” one woman, also off-camera, responded.  “I used your pen and then I brought it back to you and I said give this to somebody because it works,” a woman on-camera said.  “Yes, yes, and so we know that, and we’ve been telling them, ‘You need to use a ballpoint pen, not the Sharpie,’ and now those are getting invalidated,” said the man.  On Election Day, Maricopa County officials claimed in a video posted to social media that Sharpies are okay to use when marking ballots despite current state guidance indicating felt-tip markers not be used for ballots.<ref>https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/11/06/michigan-ag-pleads-with-residents-to-stop-telling-staff-to-shove-sharpies-up-their-rear-ends-993535</ref>

The Sharpie reference is tied to allegations of poll irregularities contained in an [[Arizona]] lawsuit alleging that ballots marked with the felt-tipped pens were rejected at some voting centers.  In one video posted to [[social media]], two women claimed that Sharpie-marked ballots were not being accepted but ballots marked with regular ballpoint pens were at one voting station.  “So, they’re invalidating votes is what they’re doing,” a man off-camera taking the video says.  “Yes,” one woman, also off-camera, responded.  “I used your pen and then I brought it back to you and I said give this to somebody because it works,” a woman on-camera said.  “Yes, yes, and so we know that, and we’ve been telling them, ‘You need to use a ballpoint pen, not the Sharpie,’ and now those are getting invalidated,” said the man.  On Election Day, Maricopa County officials claimed in a video posted to social media that Sharpies are okay to use when marking ballots despite current state guidance indicating felt-tip markers not be used for ballots.<ref>https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/11/06/michigan-ag-pleads-with-residents-to-stop-telling-staff-to-shove-sharpies-up-their-rear-ends-993535</ref>

In violation of federal law concerning candidates for federal office, [[Massachusetts]] destroys ballots and images on election day, Dr. Shiva says.  Shiva says he was banned from Twitter for saying this, even though he had it confirmed by the Massachusetts [[secretary of state]].

In violation of federal law concerning candidates for federal office, [[Massachusetts]] destroys ballots and images on election day, Dr. Shiva says.  Shiva says he was banned from Twitter for saying this, even though he had it confirmed by the Massachusetts [[secretary of state]].

Dominion voting systems is set up to make it easy to change & delete results. A [[NeverTrump|Resistance member]] with adminitrator access in a warehouse full of machines can enter whatever result, and delete previous results.<ref>https://twitter.com/PlaysTrumpCard/status/1326508337140207619</ref><ref>[https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/DVS-DemocracySuite511/documentation/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf Democracy Suite® EMS Results Tally & Reporting User Guide], Version: 5.11-CO::7, May 28, 2019</ref>

Dominion voting systems is set up to make it easy to change & delete results. A [[NeverTrump|Resistance member]] with administrator access in a warehouse full of machines can enter whatever result, and delete previous results.<ref>https://twitter.com/PlaysTrumpCard/status/1326508337140207619</ref><ref>[https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/DVS-DemocracySuite511/documentation/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf Democracy Suite® EMS Results Tally & Reporting User Guide], Version: 5.11-CO::7, May 28, 2019</ref>

Lathrup Village is in Oakland County.  Its mayor, Kelly Garrett while mayor also was working as a full-time Project Manager/Customer Relations Manager for Dominion Voting Systems.  A contract dated March 1, 2017 shows Garrett's name as one of the Dominion Representatives executing a deal in the amount of $24,875,311 with the State of Michigan.  In 2019 Garrett became the Deputy Director of the Michigan Democratic Party.  Gov. Gretchen Whitmer then appointed Garrett to the Commission on Community Action & Economic Opportunity.<ref>https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-former-dominion-project-manager-who-helped-execute-25-million-contract-with-state-of-mi-was-democrat-mayor-at-same-time/</ref>

Lathrup Village is in Oakland County.  Its mayor, Kelly Garrett while mayor also was working as a full-time Project Manager/Customer Relations Manager for Dominion Voting Systems.  A contract dated March 1, 2017 shows Garrett's name as one of the Dominion Representatives executing a deal in the amount of $24,875,311 with the State of Michigan.  In 2019 Garrett became the Deputy Director of the Michigan Democratic Party.  Gov. Gretchen Whitmer then appointed Garrett to the Commission on Community Action & Economic Opportunity.<ref>https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-former-dominion-project-manager-who-helped-execute-25-million-contract-with-state-of-mi-was-democrat-mayor-at-same-time/</ref>

In the township of Troy in Oakland County, the vote share shifted from 51%/49% in 2016 to 80%/20% in 2020 due to Biden receiving 98% of new votes above 2016 and 109% of new voter registrations. Looking county-wide, Biden gained 2.32 new voters over 2016 levels to every 1 new Trump voter in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 2.54 additional new voters per Trump voter for Oakland County.  

In the township of Troy in Oakland County, the vote share shifted from 51%/49% in 2016 to 80%/20% in 2020 due to Biden receiving 98% of new votes above 2016 and 109% of new voter registrations. Looking county-wide, Biden gained 2.32 new voters over 2016 levels to every 1 new Trump voter in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 2.54 additional new voters per Trump voter for Oakland County.  

Based on these statistically anomalous results that occurred in a handful of townships in these two counties, Dr. Quinell’s model determined that there were 40,771 anomalous votes in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 46,125 anomalous votes in Oakland County, for a total of nearly 87,000 anomalous votes or approximately 65% of Biden’s purported lead in Michigan.

Based on these statistically anomalous results that occurred in a handful of townships in these two counties, Dr. Quinell's model determined that there were 40,771 anomalous votes in Wayne County (outside Detroit) and 46,125 anomalous votes in Oakland County, for a total of nearly 87,000 anomalous votes or approximately 65% of Biden's purported lead in Michigan.

The expert witness testimony of Russell James Ramsland, Jr. identified an event that occurred in Michigan on November 4, 2020 that is “physically impossible”.  "The event" reflected in the data are “4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined

The expert witness testimony of Russell James Ramsland Jr. identified an event that occurred in Michigan on November 4, 2020, that is “physically impossible”.  "The event" reflected in the data are “4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined

interval of 2 hour[s] and 38 minutes” for four precincts/townships in four Michigan counties (Wayne, Oakland, Macomb ne and Kent). Based on Mr. Ramsland’s analysis of the voting machines available at the referenced locations, he determined that the maximum processing capability during this period was only 94,867 ballots, so that “there were 289,866 more ballots processed in the time available for processing in the four precincts/townships, than there was processing capacity.”  This amount is alone is nearly twice the number of ballots by which

interval of 2 hour[s] and 38 minutes” for four precincts/townships in four Michigan counties (Wayne, Oakland, Macomb ne and Kent). Based on Mr. Ramsland's analysis of the voting machines available at the referenced locations, he determined that the maximum processing capability during this period was only 94,867 ballots, so that “there were 289,866 more ballots processed in the time available for processing in the four precincts/townships, than there was processing capacity.”  This amount is alone is nearly twice the number of ballots by which

Biden purportedly leads President Trump (i.e., approximately 154,180).

Biden purportedly leads President Trump (i.e., approximately 154,180).