Difference between revisions of "Talk:Settled science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autofire372 (talk | contribs) |
(Oops! Try that again...and again!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[User:Ed_Poor|€d]] why wa$te a good opportunity to i££u$trate the $en$e of [[free trade]]? The<br>¢urrent arti¢£e ju$ | + | [[User:Ed_Poor|€d]] why wa$te a good opportunity to i££u$trate the $en$e of [[free trade]]? The<br>¢urrent arti¢£e cou£d be u$ed to ju$sify [[Essay:_Liberal_Falsehoods|£ibera£ Fa£$ehood$]] that ¢onfu$e [[absolute advantage| ab$o£ute advantage]] with [[comparative advantage|¢omparative advantage]] i.e. [[offshoring|off$horing]] and the importation of unde$ired ''produ¢t$''. Even [[Liberal|£ibera£]] [[Protectionism|prote¢tioni$t]]<br>e¢onomi¢$ are pedd£ed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Tfa&direction=prev&oldid=217623 here]. i$ thi$ <big>¢</big>ommypedia? [[User:BritishConservative|BritishConservative]] 20:35, 7 July 2007 (EDT) |
I believe this is meant to illustrate the silliness of "settled science".--[[User:Autofire|Autofire]] 20:38, 7 July 2007 (EDT) | I believe this is meant to illustrate the silliness of "settled science".--[[User:Autofire|Autofire]] 20:38, 7 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:41, July 8, 2007
€d why wa$te a good opportunity to i££u$trate the $en$e of free trade? The
¢urrent arti¢£e cou£d be u$ed to ju$sify £ibera£ Fa£$ehood$ that ¢onfu$e ab$o£ute advantage with ¢omparative advantage i.e. off$horing and the importation of unde$ired produ¢t$. Even £ibera£ prote¢tioni$t
e¢onomi¢$ are pedd£ed here. i$ thi$ ¢ommypedia? BritishConservative 20:35, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
I believe this is meant to illustrate the silliness of "settled science".--Autofire 20:38, 7 July 2007 (EDT)