17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
stop wasting my time
::I assume that if liberals reply with jokes, etc., it means they ''acknowledge'' that they cannot dispute the facts or principles involved. Why else would they try to make a distraction? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:00, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
::I assume that if liberals reply with jokes, etc., it means they ''acknowledge'' that they cannot dispute the facts or principles involved. Why else would they try to make a distraction? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:00, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
:So being a free marketeer with respect for science makes one a liberal? I have no problem with the science behind global warming. It seems pretty koscher to me. The external link was a well put argument for free trade. Something with which I whole heartedly agree. Of course my preference for facts and evidence over blind belief may not go down well here. Who has a monopoly on Conservatism? What is the joke? This encyclopedia or the experience that freedom and free market economies are irreseprable? Free people may think what they may, but without free economies they would hardly be in a position to do so. If freedom and facts are [[liberal]] then a liberal I am - your words not mine! Now stop wasting my time and create some wealth! (or articles for some points in Mr. [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s [[talk:Main_Page#Mikhail_Kalashnikov|New socialst plan]]). [[User:BritishConservative|BritishConservative]] 22:29, 7 July 2007 (EDT)