Difference between revisions of "User talk:Leffingwell"
(Welcome, Move to Your User Page, Warren G. Harding,) |
Leffingwell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Welcome}} Your introduction normally goes on your user page and not user talk. This page is reserved for comments like the following: | {{Welcome}} Your introduction normally goes on your user page and not user talk. This page is reserved for comments like the following: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Warren G. Harding== | ==Warren G. Harding== | ||
Why did you remove this large part of the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Warren_G._Harding&curid=8387&diff=221683&oldid=221679&rcid=237442 Warren G. Harding] article? Normally you should discuss such serious changes in the article's talk page, and I see not edits from you. Without such an explanation, you stand a likely chance of getting blocked as a vandal and having all your work rolled back. Please explain yourself. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 03:19, 8 July 2007 (EDT) | Why did you remove this large part of the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Warren_G._Harding&curid=8387&diff=221683&oldid=221679&rcid=237442 Warren G. Harding] article? Normally you should discuss such serious changes in the article's talk page, and I see not edits from you. Without such an explanation, you stand a likely chance of getting blocked as a vandal and having all your work rolled back. Please explain yourself. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 03:19, 8 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, I meant no harm. If there is a formal process of submitting edits to a committee for review and approval, I don't know about it, and would be glad to see those rules if you could point me in the right direction. My changes were based on scholarly research of an accredited researcher backed by my own fact checking (which was not to the level of thoroughness I would probably like but I am an amateur here, as I assume we all were). Is there any actual objection to the substance of what I wrote, or is this only about process? [[User:Leffingwell|Leffingwell]] 16:52, 8 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:52, July 8, 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Leffingwell, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Leffingwell!
Your introduction normally goes on your user page and not user talk. This page is reserved for comments like the following:
Warren G. Harding
Why did you remove this large part of the Warren G. Harding article? Normally you should discuss such serious changes in the article's talk page, and I see not edits from you. Without such an explanation, you stand a likely chance of getting blocked as a vandal and having all your work rolled back. Please explain yourself. --Crocoite 03:19, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
Well, I meant no harm. If there is a formal process of submitting edits to a committee for review and approval, I don't know about it, and would be glad to see those rules if you could point me in the right direction. My changes were based on scholarly research of an accredited researcher backed by my own fact checking (which was not to the level of thoroughness I would probably like but I am an amateur here, as I assume we all were). Is there any actual objection to the substance of what I wrote, or is this only about process? Leffingwell 16:52, 8 July 2007 (EDT)