Difference between revisions of "Talk:Al Gore"
m (Reverted edits by AlGoreFan (Talk); changed back to last version by Additioner) |
Zmaxcomputer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Gossip== | ==Gossip== | ||
The entire Criticism section seems to be based on gossip. Discussing Al Gore's electrical bills and monetary practices has nothing to do with his public life. Instead, this section should contain references to public criticism of Gore, not just the criticisms of the user who wrote this section. --[[User:Charliemc86|Charliemc86]] | The entire Criticism section seems to be based on gossip. Discussing Al Gore's electrical bills and monetary practices has nothing to do with his public life. Instead, this section should contain references to public criticism of Gore, not just the criticisms of the user who wrote this section. --[[User:Charliemc86|Charliemc86]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | It seems this entire website is slamming democrats every chance that is given, even if its not serious. Exploiting their flaws instead of posting any positive effects they might have done. I love the example about pointing out that Al Gore uses a private jet; such a terrible crime. It doesn't state his intentions while using the jet were good or bad it just states that because he uses his jet he is a hypocrite. O and he owns a mine which is "potentially" dangerous. Wasn't aware of a mine that wasn't dangerous. Instead of bashing the democrats so much, why is it not in conservapedia's nature to bash the republicans a bit? Their mission statement is to post neutral articles from a conservative point of view? Then why is it on this page they get pissed at gore for using his JET, but when i look at Nixon's article on this site nothing is mentioned about how poorly he managed the Vietnam war? Guess the whole jet thing is more important huh? | ||
== Recommend == | == Recommend == | ||
Revision as of 04:16, July 9, 2007
3/20/07 - Intended to do considerable work to correct spelling and grammatical errors, but time flies. Will return when I have more time. In the interim, I have updated some info and worked to maintain the encyclopedic nature of the entry (attempting to resolve some "opinion" matter which had existed).
This entire entry needs to have citations or references or anything. This violates the 2nd commandment...always cite!--Eljoe2 01:40, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
alleged voting irregularities
I don't think that it is best to say that Gore challenged the 2000 election because of "alleged voting irregularities". Gore's main argument was that the election was very close, and another recount might have favored him. Yes, there were some irregularities in the way that hanging chads were counted, and maybe some other matters, but Gore was really taking a stand on how those should be counted. RSchlafly 09:25, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Gossip
The entire Criticism section seems to be based on gossip. Discussing Al Gore's electrical bills and monetary practices has nothing to do with his public life. Instead, this section should contain references to public criticism of Gore, not just the criticisms of the user who wrote this section. --Charliemc86
It seems this entire website is slamming democrats every chance that is given, even if its not serious. Exploiting their flaws instead of posting any positive effects they might have done. I love the example about pointing out that Al Gore uses a private jet; such a terrible crime. It doesn't state his intentions while using the jet were good or bad it just states that because he uses his jet he is a hypocrite. O and he owns a mine which is "potentially" dangerous. Wasn't aware of a mine that wasn't dangerous. Instead of bashing the democrats so much, why is it not in conservapedia's nature to bash the republicans a bit? Their mission statement is to post neutral articles from a conservative point of view? Then why is it on this page they get pissed at gore for using his JET, but when i look at Nixon's article on this site nothing is mentioned about how poorly he managed the Vietnam war? Guess the whole jet thing is more important huh?
Recommend
Conservapedia:Manual of Style/Politicians - Myk 02:26, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Photo
So did we go out of our way to find the least flattering Al Gore picture we could find? Czolgolz 01:45, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
- Probably. Just like Rosie O'Donnell. GodlessLiberal 15:31, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
the article need some Al Gore photo.--Kádár Tamás 04:30, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- That one at his breakfast's particularly good. --Wikinterpretertalk?
I thought that the one with him as Vice President was nice. --Additioner 15:00, 21 May 2007 (EDT)