Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roe v. Wade"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Just jammin)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
LOL!  Great edit, Lil Cain.  If she really was a lesbian, it's funny that she got pregnant.  I would think a cite would be needed for that...--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 22:45, 9 March 2007 (EST)
 
LOL!  Great edit, Lil Cain.  If she really was a lesbian, it's funny that she got pregnant.  I would think a cite would be needed for that...--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 22:45, 9 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
I've also edited out the section about no one caring about the judgement for a time. Even if it was not widely known(something I don't have the first notion about), I'm sure a substaintal minority of those affected did care at the time(I am of course open to being rebutted on this, but with references preferably)[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.46, 10 March 2007 (GMT)

Revision as of 03:47, March 10, 2007

I've deleted the comment about Roe being a lesbian. It seems the kind of thing a reference is needed for. One for her real name would be nice too. [User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.43, 10 March 2007 (GMT)

LOL! Great edit, Lil Cain. If she really was a lesbian, it's funny that she got pregnant. I would think a cite would be needed for that...--AmesG 22:45, 9 March 2007 (EST)

I've also edited out the section about no one caring about the judgement for a time. Even if it was not widely known(something I don't have the first notion about), I'm sure a substaintal minority of those affected did care at the time(I am of course open to being rebutted on this, but with references preferably)[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.46, 10 March 2007 (GMT)