Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roe v. Wade"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I've deleted the comment about Roe being a lesbian. It seems the kind of thing a reference is needed for. One for her real name would be nice too. [User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.43, 10 March 2007 (GMT) | + | I've deleted the comment about Roe being a lesbian. It seems the kind of thing a reference is needed for. One for her real name would be nice too. [[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.43, 10 March 2007 (GMT) |
LOL! Great edit, Lil Cain. If she really was a lesbian, it's funny that she got pregnant. I would think a cite would be needed for that...--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 22:45, 9 March 2007 (EST) | LOL! Great edit, Lil Cain. If she really was a lesbian, it's funny that she got pregnant. I would think a cite would be needed for that...--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 22:45, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| − | I've also edited out the section about no one caring about the judgement for a time. Even if it was not widely known(something I don't have the first notion about), I'm sure a substaintal minority of those affected did care at the time(I am of course open to being rebutted on this, but with references preferably)[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.46, 10 March 2007 (GMT) | + | I've also edited out the section about no one caring about the judgement for a time. Even if it was not widely known(something I don't have the first notion about), I'm sure a substaintal minority of those affected did care at the time(I am of course open to being rebutted on this, but with references preferably) |
| + | also, should the bit at the end not be a statement of fact, or not there? Surely what the judgement says is legal fact at this point, not opinion | ||
| + | [[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.46, 10 March 2007 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | also, should the bit at the end not be a statement of fact, or not there? Surely what the judgement says is legal fact at this point, not opinion | ||
Revision as of 03:49, March 10, 2007
I've deleted the comment about Roe being a lesbian. It seems the kind of thing a reference is needed for. One for her real name would be nice too. lil_cain 03.43, 10 March 2007 (GMT)
LOL! Great edit, Lil Cain. If she really was a lesbian, it's funny that she got pregnant. I would think a cite would be needed for that...--AmesG 22:45, 9 March 2007 (EST)
I've also edited out the section about no one caring about the judgement for a time. Even if it was not widely known(something I don't have the first notion about), I'm sure a substaintal minority of those affected did care at the time(I am of course open to being rebutted on this, but with references preferably) also, should the bit at the end not be a statement of fact, or not there? Surely what the judgement says is legal fact at this point, not opinion lil_cain 03.46, 10 March 2007 (GMT)
also, should the bit at the end not be a statement of fact, or not there? Surely what the judgement says is legal fact at this point, not opinion