Difference between revisions of "Talk:Archaeopteryx"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Italics) |
m (unsigned) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Amongst pro-evolution scientists Feduccia's research is considered to be completely disproven. Referencing his research without mentioning the dozens of papers that refute it makes the conservapedia appear biased and/or out of date. | + | Amongst pro-evolution scientists Feduccia's research is considered to be completely disproven. Referencing his research without mentioning the dozens of papers that refute it makes the conservapedia appear biased and/or out of date. {{unsigned|token}} |
== Italics == | == Italics == | ||
Folks, please. No matter what your view, it's proper scientific style to use italics. [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 22:21, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | Folks, please. No matter what your view, it's proper scientific style to use italics. [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 22:21, 19 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:35, July 11, 2007
Amongst pro-evolution scientists Feduccia's research is considered to be completely disproven. Referencing his research without mentioning the dozens of papers that refute it makes the conservapedia appear biased and/or out of date. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by token (talk)
Italics
Folks, please. No matter what your view, it's proper scientific style to use italics. Sterile 22:21, 19 April 2007 (EDT)