Difference between revisions of "Talk:Impeachment and removal"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: The section on Clinton has been rather obviously copied and pasted unthinkingly from somewhere else: 'Hillary Clinton, pollster's choice to run in 2004' - th=at statement must be at least ...)
 
(still confusing)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The section on Clinton has been rather obviously copied and pasted unthinkingly from somewhere else: 'Hillary Clinton, pollster's choice to run in 2004' - th=at statement must be at least four years old.
 
The section on Clinton has been rather obviously copied and pasted unthinkingly from somewhere else: 'Hillary Clinton, pollster's choice to run in 2004' - th=at statement must be at least four years old.
 +
 +
==Precise meaning of term==
 +
 +
Should we say that impeachment is removal? This seems confusing to me.
 +
 +
I'd rather say that impeachment is the ''first step'' in removing an official from office. Impeachment is the formal accusation by the House. ''Removal'' requires confirmation by the Senate. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:53, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:53, July 12, 2007

The section on Clinton has been rather obviously copied and pasted unthinkingly from somewhere else: 'Hillary Clinton, pollster's choice to run in 2004' - th=at statement must be at least four years old.

Precise meaning of term

Should we say that impeachment is removal? This seems confusing to me.

I'd rather say that impeachment is the first step in removing an official from office. Impeachment is the formal accusation by the House. Removal requires confirmation by the Senate. --Ed Poor Talk 21:53, 11 July 2007 (EDT)