Difference between revisions of "Settled science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(If you question whether global warming is happening, or whether human activity is causing it, then you must be a crack-pot.) |
Jazzman831 (talk | contribs) m (trogdor the boldenator) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Donald Luskin wrote: | Donald Luskin wrote: | ||
| − | :If you question whether [[global warming]] is happening, or whether human activity is causing it, or whether it’s worth doing anything about it, then you must be a crack-pot. You are standing athwart the “consensus of scientists.” You are disputing | + | :If you question whether [[global warming]] is happening, or whether human activity is causing it, or whether it’s worth doing anything about it, then you must be a crack-pot. You are standing athwart the “consensus of scientists.” You are disputing “'''settled science'''.” You are a “global warming denier,” the moral equivalent of an apologist for the Nazi holocaust. [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDY5OTM1ZThlN2NjYTUzZjVlZmVkMDU3MDZkODM0NDM=] |
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDY5OTM1ZThlN2NjYTUzZjVlZmVkMDU3MDZkODM0NDM= A Convenient (and Excellent) Truth] | *[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDY5OTM1ZThlN2NjYTUzZjVlZmVkMDU3MDZkODM0NDM= A Convenient (and Excellent) Truth] | ||
Revision as of 21:13, July 13, 2007
Donald Luskin wrote:
- If you question whether global warming is happening, or whether human activity is causing it, or whether it’s worth doing anything about it, then you must be a crack-pot. You are standing athwart the “consensus of scientists.” You are disputing “settled science.” You are a “global warming denier,” the moral equivalent of an apologist for the Nazi holocaust. [1]