Difference between revisions of "Talk:An Inconvenient Truth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→source) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
do you really consider a townhall article reposted from Newsbusters a reliable source? Wow [[User:SirJim|SirJim]] 19:23, 15 July 2007 (EDT) | do you really consider a townhall article reposted from Newsbusters a reliable source? Wow [[User:SirJim|SirJim]] 19:23, 15 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Do you really consider your comment intelligent? Wow. More enlightened would be you proving it false, or providing a better one. I understand to some people, a merit based site is new. Try it, you might actually find it liberating! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 02:48, 18 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:48, July 18, 2007
Maybe nothing but I can find the article on climate cycles, so maybe you should put a source there to support your theory otherwise remove it. Priestspez 15:45, 19 June 2007 (EST)
source
do you really consider a townhall article reposted from Newsbusters a reliable source? Wow SirJim 19:23, 15 July 2007 (EDT)