Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bible"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Why describe it when we can transcribe it?) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
What say you? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:28, 11 March 2007 (EST) | What say you? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:28, 11 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Why describe it when we can transcribe it? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sounds good to me. But why not PUT the whole Bible on here? It gets quoted often enough. | ||
Revision as of 05:34, March 11, 2007
no discussion of the Bible? Muchodelcrazy 00:19, 8 March 2007 (EST)
Article is too brief!
This is The Bible! Don't you think the Word of God deserves a greater article, one with more detail on the subject and its history? I think so! In fact, I think I will start out by doing just that, and here's the proposed layout:
- Intro
- Brief listing of the books within, divided of course into Old/New Testaments.
- History of the Bible...as in who wrote it.
- Why the world accepts/rejects it.
- Current status
- Include pics and charts and links.
What say you? Karajou 00:28, 11 March 2007 (EST)
Why describe it when we can transcribe it?
Sounds good to me. But why not PUT the whole Bible on here? It gets quoted often enough.