17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: + +
→Image
:::This whole hypothesis is probably not supportable by any kind of rational or reasoned investigation--except it may be believed and propagated by ''other'' extremists. Hence you take a big risk offering that theory here. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:22, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
:::This whole hypothesis is probably not supportable by any kind of rational or reasoned investigation--except it may be believed and propagated by ''other'' extremists. Hence you take a big risk offering that theory here. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:22, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
::::When put into the context of "should there be an image of Mohammed"? -there is very little risk. We are allowing the dictates of <i>their</i> society and their values to affect how we present information in our society. In our society -presenting images is the norm. We recognize that what images convey is more than "idolatry". (The reason that images of Mohammed are forbidden is to prevent Idol worship). Furthermore, the image that is posted is relatively tame and respectful [Image:Maome.jpg] -not like the one that I would post. Is there another reason that you aren't posting the image? -Did you get a bomb threat?
== Too Politically Correct ==
== Too Politically Correct ==