Difference between revisions of "Nuclear winter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by MidgarMadman (Talk); changed back to last version by Ed Poor) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) (categorize) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
[[Fred Singer]] said: | [[Fred Singer]] said: | ||
:I always considered "nuclear winter" to be a hoax and scientifically incorrect—and have said so in my Nightline debate with [[Carl Sagan]]. The data from the [[Kuwait]] oil fires support this view. Actually, nuclear explosions would create a strong [[greenhouse effect]] and cause warming rather than cooling. Let's hope we never have to find out. [http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9551] | :I always considered "nuclear winter" to be a hoax and scientifically incorrect—and have said so in my Nightline debate with [[Carl Sagan]]. The data from the [[Kuwait]] oil fires support this view. Actually, nuclear explosions would create a strong [[greenhouse effect]] and cause warming rather than cooling. Let's hope we never have to find out. [http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9551] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[category:articles proposed for deletion]] | ||
Revision as of 04:42, July 24, 2007
Fred Singer said:
- I always considered "nuclear winter" to be a hoax and scientifically incorrect—and have said so in my Nightline debate with Carl Sagan. The data from the Kuwait oil fires support this view. Actually, nuclear explosions would create a strong greenhouse effect and cause warming rather than cooling. Let's hope we never have to find out. [1]