Difference between revisions of "Talk:Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Query) |
(sanctimonious nonsense) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does the first sentence in the article refer to a '''public''' library? One would assume it does otherwise there would not be a controversy.[[User_talk:U2| U2]] 21:59, 24 July 2007 (EDT) | Does the first sentence in the article refer to a '''public''' library? One would assume it does otherwise there would not be a controversy.[[User_talk:U2| U2]] 21:59, 24 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==The Constitutional issue== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A frequent argument given by those who want to discriminate ''against'' religion, is that to fail to do so is the same as [[establishment]] of religion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This, of course, is nonsense, and they know it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The military has long employed chaplains, but no one has ever complained that this ''establishes'' any particular religion - or even that it enforces belief in God (atheists and agnostics are free to stay away from religous services, just as believers who are backsliding or are simply lazy that day!). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:02, July 25, 2007
Does the first sentence in the article refer to a public library? One would assume it does otherwise there would not be a controversy. U2 21:59, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
The Constitutional issue
A frequent argument given by those who want to discriminate against religion, is that to fail to do so is the same as establishment of religion.
This, of course, is nonsense, and they know it.
The military has long employed chaplains, but no one has ever complained that this establishes any particular religion - or even that it enforces belief in God (atheists and agnostics are free to stay away from religous services, just as believers who are backsliding or are simply lazy that day!). --Ed Poor Talk 22:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT)