Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crop circles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a "crop circle" (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT) | ::I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a "crop circle" (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Joaquin, what you had in the article didn't make one bit of sense. If there had been an explanation, a citation, that would have been different. The proper way to have added it would have been with all information in place, not some idea of adding that later. Does this not seem logical to you? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 21:09, 26 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:09, July 27, 2007
Stonehenge, geometric pattern.
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 11:23, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
- Joaquín, why did you revert my edits? "Crop circles" is not a proper noun, and as such should not be capitalized. A crop circle is not simply a "geometric pattern," otherwise any quilt would be a crop circle. I looked in those (very poor) sources, and I couldn't find any claim that crop circles existed in the 13th century. The most shocking thing is that you continue to maintain that Stonehenge and Hadrian's wall are crop circles. Both are made of stone! And Hadrian's wall isn't even in a pattern, it's a line! Jazzman831 14:06, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
- Dan
- I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a "crop circle" (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
Joaquin, what you had in the article didn't make one bit of sense. If there had been an explanation, a citation, that would have been different. The proper way to have added it would have been with all information in place, not some idea of adding that later. Does this not seem logical to you? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 21:09, 26 July 2007 (EDT)