Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stonehenge"
(reply) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Dan, I agree since I don't see how the crop circle reference has anything to do with this article. I will remove the reference. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 20:36, 29 July 2007 (EDT) | :Dan, I agree since I don't see how the crop circle reference has anything to do with this article. I will remove the reference. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 20:36, 29 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Uncited garbage?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The date of Stonehenge is not "uncited garbage". It's an important part of the article, how old it is. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:55, 29 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:55, July 30, 2007
I have a book, Rock and Gem by Ronald Louis Bonewitz, The Smithsonian Institution, ISBN: 0756609623, which has a two page article on Stonehenge. It states that "Stonehenge was built in several stages, the first beginnning in about 3100 BC." There are many other things in the Rock and Gem article that would be helpful in the CP article. I would like to colloborate with someone that could integrate the Rock and Gem article with the CP article, without plagiarizing the book. --Crocoite 20:00, 29 July 2007 (EDT)
Also, should we remove the crop circle reference now that Stonehenge is no longer mentioned in that article? DanH 20:11, 29 July 2007 (EDT)
- Dan, I agree since I don't see how the crop circle reference has anything to do with this article. I will remove the reference. --Crocoite 20:36, 29 July 2007 (EDT)
Uncited garbage?
The date of Stonehenge is not "uncited garbage". It's an important part of the article, how old it is. DanH 20:55, 29 July 2007 (EDT)