Difference between revisions of "User talk:NotForgotten"
NotForgotten (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hello, please be aware that while we can put references to both soccer and football on the pages you are creating for English teams, that we still have to be careful of how we categorize. UK soccer is the preferred method. There is a link to football sports from there. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 18:01, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | Hello, please be aware that while we can put references to both soccer and football on the pages you are creating for English teams, that we still have to be careful of how we categorize. UK soccer is the preferred method. There is a link to football sports from there. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 18:01, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh sure, that's not a problem. But a suggestion - I wonder if "UK Football" might not only be less divisive, but also more accurate? [[User:NotForgotten|NotForgotten]] 18:54, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:54, July 31, 2007
Welcome!
Hello, NotForgotten, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, NotForgotten!
--Crocoite 22:42, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
I think you should enable your e-mail before you get stuck in. BrianCo 13:58, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Football
Hello, please be aware that while we can put references to both soccer and football on the pages you are creating for English teams, that we still have to be careful of how we categorize. UK soccer is the preferred method. There is a link to football sports from there. Learn together 18:01, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Oh sure, that's not a problem. But a suggestion - I wonder if "UK Football" might not only be less divisive, but also more accurate? NotForgotten 18:54, 31 July 2007 (EDT)