Difference between revisions of "User talk:AGivenVoice"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(some ideas for you)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
We are writing articles of lasting value. If you'd like to create a [[Current Events]] page, though, please go ahead! I'd like to help. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:29, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
 
We are writing articles of lasting value. If you'd like to create a [[Current Events]] page, though, please go ahead! I'd like to help. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:29, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Did you take equal exception with the other comments made or just mine?  I didn't think my comments were out of line and seemed to be in the spirit of the other comments written.  Isn't that what the Discussion section is for, discussion?
 +
--[[User:AGivenVoice|AGivenVoice]] 19:54, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:54, July 31, 2007

Welcome!

Hello, AGivenVoice, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, AGivenVoice!


Learn together 12:55, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Hi, welcome, but please note that this is not an opinion board or a political blog. It doesn't matter how "cool" you think Jack Chick is, or how happy you are to find a 3-star general accused of deceit.

We are writing articles of lasting value. If you'd like to create a Current Events page, though, please go ahead! I'd like to help. --Ed Poor Talk 19:29, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

Did you take equal exception with the other comments made or just mine? I didn't think my comments were out of line and seemed to be in the spirit of the other comments written. Isn't that what the Discussion section is for, discussion? --AGivenVoice 19:54, 31 July 2007 (EDT)