Difference between revisions of "Talk:Terri Schiavo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Digitamer81 (talk | contribs) |
m (Reverted edits by Digitamer81 (Talk); changed back to last version by TheGoodSociety) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Yes, this page certaintly requires sources that better support the statements made, and perhaps more information regarding the legal debate which took place.--[[User:TheGoodSociety|Joe]] 16:18, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | :::Yes, this page certaintly requires sources that better support the statements made, and perhaps more information regarding the legal debate which took place.--[[User:TheGoodSociety|Joe]] 16:18, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 22:52, August 2, 2007
I Believe the inclusion of Angel Raisch, drug abuser, on this list of Schiavo-like individuals, is extremely inappropriate. Terri was a bulimic, and possibly the victim of domestic abuse, not a law-flouting hippie pursuing selfish ends. DunsScotus 14:42, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Spoon, discuss on talk first before including. Raich's 'starvation' strains credulity given the well-known affects of marijuana intake upon appetite. DunsScotus 15:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- I insist that Raich, as she is not in a vegetative state, is not in any way comparable to Terri. Angel Raich can eat, if she choses to. She simply prefers to revel in her sinfulness and fails to take responsibility for her food intake in a responsible, law-abiding, fashion. DunsScotus 15:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Spoon, discuss on talk first before including. Raich's 'starvation' strains credulity given the well-known affects of marijuana intake upon appetite. DunsScotus 15:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Did anyone notice that the sources listed DIRECTLY contradict the opinions expressed in the article? Whomever is the author of the article should either find new sources or take out any subjective comments. Otherwise you render the viewpoints within as false. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DrCody (talk)
- Yes, this page certaintly requires sources that better support the statements made, and perhaps more information regarding the legal debate which took place.--Joe 16:18, 2 August 2007 (EDT)