Changes

Line 128: Line 128:  
:That is a very good point.  The fact that the sex article has been censored on this site is a bit odd.  There is no need to get into the depth that Wikipedia goes into about human sexualit, sex positions, etc.  But some acknowledgment or treatment of the way that nearly all multi-cellular organisms come to be seems to be something that shoudl be included in anything claiming to be "encyclopedic".--[[User:Zerba|Zerba]] 12:36, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:That is a very good point.  The fact that the sex article has been censored on this site is a bit odd.  There is no need to get into the depth that Wikipedia goes into about human sexualit, sex positions, etc.  But some acknowledgment or treatment of the way that nearly all multi-cellular organisms come to be seems to be something that shoudl be included in anything claiming to be "encyclopedic".--[[User:Zerba|Zerba]] 12:36, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
You've blocked and locked the page on Sex, but Rape is still up and running. Please explain.
+
You've blocked and locked the page on [[Sex]], but [[Rape]] is still up and running. Please explain.
    
== items 1,4 and 7 seem to be mutally exclusive ==
 
== items 1,4 and 7 seem to be mutally exclusive ==
2

edits