Changes

:For example, race is [[immutable]], while sexual behavior (for adults) is 100% a matter of choice. (It may be ''difficult'' to remain celibate, or chaste, or faithful, but there's no doubt that it can be done.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 22:52, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

:For example, race is [[immutable]], while sexual behavior (for adults) is 100% a matter of choice. (It may be ''difficult'' to remain celibate, or chaste, or faithful, but there's no doubt that it can be done.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 22:52, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

::I was refering to the incivil manner he made the point; he used "you" and "your" twice, in a pointed and personal manner: "I don't follow '''''your''''' reasoning....you say 'Aha! ....That's like telling someone they are not allowed to use the main entrance to a building..."

::I was refering to the incivil manner he made the point; he used "you" and "your" twice, in a pointed and personal manner: "I don't follow '''''your''''' reasoning....'''you''' say 'Aha! ....That's like telling someone they are not allowed to use the main entrance to a building..."

::This is a quit typical debating technique.  Rather than address the merits of the issue, shame your opponent with vield inneundo that his POV is racist.  This should never be tolerated under any circumstance, even in a place like WP, but we know the masters of the technique reside there.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 00:51, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

::This is a quit typical debating technique.  Rather than address the merits of the issue, shame your opponent with vieled inneundo that his POV is racist.  This should never be tolerated under any circumstance, even in a place like WP, but we know the masters of the technique reside there.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 00:51, 10 August 2007 (EDT)