Difference between revisions of "Climatology"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(climatology is not a real science, not yet a discipline that has succeeded in understanding the core of its subject the way other sciences have)
(Reference section, "Environment" Category)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Climatology''' is a [[physical science]] still in its infancy. It seeks "a functional, comprehensive, systematic and interconnected understanding of the [[nonlinear system]] formed by the [[atmosphere]], the [[ocean]]s, the [[land mass]] and the [[biosphere]], and their interaction with [[solar radiation]]."
 
'''Climatology''' is a [[physical science]] still in its infancy. It seeks "a functional, comprehensive, systematic and interconnected understanding of the [[nonlinear system]] formed by the [[atmosphere]], the [[ocean]]s, the [[land mass]] and the [[biosphere]], and their interaction with [[solar radiation]]."
  
−
*...climatology is not a real science, not yet a discipline that has succeeded in understanding the core of its subject the way other sciences have, nor one that is able to effectively adhere to the principles of the scientific method and thereby become rigorous. [http://www.aetherometry.com/global_warming/Section_I_3.html]
+
*...climatology is not a real science, not yet a discipline that has succeeded in understanding the core of its subject the way other sciences have, nor one that is able to effectively adhere to the principles of the scientific method and thereby become rigorous. <ref>http://www.aetherometry.com/global_warming/Section_I_3.html</ref>
  
−
[[category:Fields of academic study]]
+
==References==
 +
 
 +
<References/>
 +
 
 +
[[category:Environment]]

Revision as of 18:37, August 10, 2007

Climatology is a physical science still in its infancy. It seeks "a functional, comprehensive, systematic and interconnected understanding of the nonlinear system formed by the atmosphere, the oceans, the land mass and the biosphere, and their interaction with solar radiation."

  • ...climatology is not a real science, not yet a discipline that has succeeded in understanding the core of its subject the way other sciences have, nor one that is able to effectively adhere to the principles of the scientific method and thereby become rigorous. [1]

References