Difference between revisions of "Debate:Is Conservapedia representing a conservative POV or a Young Earth Creationist POV?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
::To answer your question, the answer is "no", because the Hebrew word used for "day" here means a literal, 24-hour day. [[User:DebateKid|DebateKid]] 17:17, 30 June 2007 (EDT)
 
::To answer your question, the answer is "no", because the Hebrew word used for "day" here means a literal, 24-hour day. [[User:DebateKid|DebateKid]] 17:17, 30 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::What about the passage in the the Bible about (paraphrasing, because I don't know the exact verse) "a thousand years is as a day int the mind of God, and a day a thousand years"?--[[User:Freiberg|Freiberg]] 14:45, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:45, August 10, 2007

Conservative

Young Earth Creationist

I would have to say YEC. Most of the science articles have a YEC POV at the bottom. If Conservapedia was representing the conservative POV then you would not see YEC POVS for everything without seeing some other conservative POV. (comment from User:Tims --Aulis Eskola 18:35, 10 May 2007 (EDT))

This just all goes back to the problem of using terms like conservative and liberal as blanket terms. Obviously not all conservatives are YEC, but the adminstration of this site appears to believe the word conservative encompasses certain beliefs and there is no grey areas. And I imagine in doing so they will alienate a good chunk of the population who consider themselves conservative.
But the fact of the matter is, it's their site, they can call it what they want and run it how they want. People can get on here and post all they want about how it's not fair and balanced, how it is irresponsible, etc, but it isn't going to make a lick of difference for how this site is managed no matter how valid the complaints are. The only real way to effect any kind of change on a site like this is if you are conservative, but bothered by the rampant YEC articles, or whatever, is to just state how this doesn't match your personal ideologies and and walk away. I believe the atmosphere is too unstable to actually convert someone, and the end result will be like-minded people running a wiki for like-minded folks, and there is nothing wrong with that. --Colest 16:03, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
"Day". Could the 7 "days " in which God created the earth (Genesis, English translation, ? from Hebrew, from?)

have as accurately been translated as "epoch" or "period of time"? Is the only valid translation "one revolution of the earth"? If God's "day" could be a billion years, 365 billion revolutions of the earth (and I do not see why not), all conflict with science on this point disappears. LA Times recent selection to put-down conservatives becomes moot. [User: Howard Long, conservative scientist, June 22 2007 9AM PDT

To answer your question, the answer is "no", because the Hebrew word used for "day" here means a literal, 24-hour day. DebateKid 17:17, 30 June 2007 (EDT)
What about the passage in the the Bible about (paraphrasing, because I don't know the exact verse) "a thousand years is as a day int the mind of God, and a day a thousand years"?--Freiberg 14:45, 10 August 2007 (EDT)