Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia"
Sandbagger (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
How ridiculous. How would a place called "Conservapedia" POSSIBLY have any sort of "bias"? | How ridiculous. How would a place called "Conservapedia" POSSIBLY have any sort of "bias"? | ||
(What's the wiki tag for 'sarcasm'?) --[[User:Sandbagger|Sandbagger]] 16:22, 11 March 2007 (EDT) | (What's the wiki tag for 'sarcasm'?) --[[User:Sandbagger|Sandbagger]] 16:22, 11 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The poll cited for belief by the US public in evolution needs to be updated. It's almost a decade old. Harris has one from 2005. [http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=581] | ||
Revision as of 22:45, March 11, 2007
Sources
If you follow the link to Cecil DeMille's wikipedia entry you'll notice that the trivia section is gone ... you should be careful to use references that are constantly being updated as they might not always prove your point. Another case of being careful what you quote: here's an article saying 51% believe god created humans, 30% say humans evolved w/ God's help and 15% say we evolved w/o God. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtml Polls aren't generally scientific and as shown by the edits to this entry you can find all sorts of different percentages for who believes what. Jrssr5 14:04, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
"The wikipedia entry accuses Conservapedia of having its own bias..." How ridiculous. How would a place called "Conservapedia" POSSIBLY have any sort of "bias"? (What's the wiki tag for 'sarcasm'?) --Sandbagger 16:22, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
The poll cited for belief by the US public in evolution needs to be updated. It's almost a decade old. Harris has one from 2005. [1]