Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lemon v. Kurtzman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autofire372 (talk | contribs) (New page: =="Liberal bias"== Andy, I failed to see any liberal bias in the original entry. All you did was insert excessive conservative bias. --~~~~) |
(Question with recent change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Andy, I failed to see any liberal bias in the original entry. All you did was insert excessive conservative bias. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'monospace'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:Autofire|<font color= 'red' face= 'monospace'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'monospace'>form!</font>]]</sup> 23:57, 5 August 2007 (EDT) | Andy, I failed to see any liberal bias in the original entry. All you did was insert excessive conservative bias. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'monospace'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:Autofire|<font color= 'red' face= 'monospace'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'monospace'>form!</font>]]</sup> 23:57, 5 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Question with recent change == | ||
| + | |||
| + | If Lemon v. Kurtzman only dealt with the use of federal funds Catholic or other parochial schools, then how come it was used in the case to deny the teaching of Intelligent Design in a secular school system? It appears your rewrite may have eliminated the scope of the case. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 12:41, 13 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:41, August 13, 2007
"Liberal bias"
Andy, I failed to see any liberal bias in the original entry. All you did was insert excessive conservative bias. --transResident Transfanform! 23:57, 5 August 2007 (EDT)
Question with recent change
If Lemon v. Kurtzman only dealt with the use of federal funds Catholic or other parochial schools, then how come it was used in the case to deny the teaching of Intelligent Design in a secular school system? It appears your rewrite may have eliminated the scope of the case. Learn together 12:41, 13 August 2007 (EDT)