Difference between revisions of "Talk:United States presidential election, 1992"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Why don't we just use the word majority instead of absolute majority? It seems to me that's simpler and less confusing, since absolute majority, if I remember correctly, is the total out ...) |
Additioner (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why don't we just use the word majority instead of absolute majority? It seems to me that's simpler and less confusing, since absolute majority, if I remember correctly, is the total out of all eligible respondants. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:54, 7 August 2007 (EDT) | Why don't we just use the word majority instead of absolute majority? It seems to me that's simpler and less confusing, since absolute majority, if I remember correctly, is the total out of all eligible respondants. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:54, 7 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That makes sense. -[[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 14:46, 17 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:46, August 17, 2007
Why don't we just use the word majority instead of absolute majority? It seems to me that's simpler and less confusing, since absolute majority, if I remember correctly, is the total out of all eligible respondants. Learn together 14:54, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
That makes sense. -Additioner 14:46, 17 August 2007 (EDT)