Difference between revisions of "Talk:Origin of Life"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Talk:Origin of life moved to Talk:Criticisms of abiogenesis: It's all one side. The right side, to be sure, but it's not a general article at the moment.)
(Essay)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
*Scientific American isn't really a journal. [[User:Masterbratac|Masterbratac]] 15:03, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
 
*Scientific American isn't really a journal. [[User:Masterbratac|Masterbratac]] 15:03, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
 
**Fixed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:26, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
 
**Fixed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:26, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Essay ==
 +
 +
This does not meet our standards for an article, but rather is an essay. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 20:46, 21 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:46, August 22, 2007

http://www.genesispark.org/genpark/spongen/spongen.htm

Grammatical error

There are numerous instances in this article where "creationist" (singular) should be "creationists" (plural).

Bootstrap problem

Why no mention thereof?

Scientific American

  • Scientific American isn't really a journal. Masterbratac 15:03, 19 August 2007 (EDT)

Essay

This does not meet our standards for an article, but rather is an essay. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 20:46, 21 August 2007 (EDT)