Difference between revisions of "User talk:BenHur"
(learn together falling down on the job! :p) |
Jazzman831 (talk | contribs) (Keep up the good work) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Welcome|sig=<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:46, 23 August 2007 (EDT)}} | {{Welcome|sig=<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:46, 23 August 2007 (EDT)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Keep up the good work == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I saw your comment on [[talk:liberal]]. Don't get discouraged by that; they have a TON of vandals around here and sometimes it puts the sysops on edge. I actually read an article last year in the New York Times about the type of Conservative you were talking about (I forget where they were... some prairy state). I found it very interesting, in terms of political theory. Even the more "advanced" views on political specra -- or more pragmatically the big political analysts -- don't really have a way to cope for "red blooded environmentalists". It's a question that could become very important in next year's election, at least for certain parts of America. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wow sorry this was longer than I intended, but I just wanted to tell you to keep making good faith edits and the editors really do get defensive. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 17:39, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:39, August 24, 2007
Welcome!
Hello, BenHur, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, BenHur!
Keep up the good work
I saw your comment on talk:liberal. Don't get discouraged by that; they have a TON of vandals around here and sometimes it puts the sysops on edge. I actually read an article last year in the New York Times about the type of Conservative you were talking about (I forget where they were... some prairy state). I found it very interesting, in terms of political theory. Even the more "advanced" views on political specra -- or more pragmatically the big political analysts -- don't really have a way to cope for "red blooded environmentalists". It's a question that could become very important in next year's election, at least for certain parts of America.
Wow sorry this was longer than I intended, but I just wanted to tell you to keep making good faith edits and the editors really do get defensive. Jazzman831 17:39, 24 August 2007 (EDT)