Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canadian newspapers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dikaiosune (talk | contribs) |
Dikaiosune (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="messagebox cleanup metadata plainlinks" | {| class="messagebox cleanup metadata plainlinks" | ||
| style="width:60px; vertical-align:top; padding:.3em;" | | | style="width:60px; vertical-align:top; padding:.3em;" | | ||
| − | | '''This section does not cite its [[{{SITENAME}}:Citing sources|references or sources]].'''<br /><small>Please help [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} improve this article] by introducing appropriate citations. | + | | '''WARNING! This section does not cite its [[{{SITENAME}}:Citing sources|references or sources]].'''<br /><small>Please help [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} improve this article] by introducing appropriate citations. This article has been tagged since '''March 11, 2007'''.</small> |
|}<includeonly>{{#if:{{{date|}}}|[[Category:Articles lacking sources from {{{date}}}]]|[[Category:Articles lacking sources]]}}[[Category:All articles lacking sources]]</includeonly><noinclude> | |}<includeonly>{{#if:{{{date|}}}|[[Category:Articles lacking sources from {{{date}}}]]|[[Category:Articles lacking sources]]}}[[Category:All articles lacking sources]]</includeonly><noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 04:47, March 12, 2007
The Toronto Star mistakenly claims that Ayn Rand was conservative and that Tom Flanagan is a social conservative.
Astute political readers will immediately recognize those errors:
- Ayn Rand was an atheist whose philosophy most closely resembled libertarianism.
- Tom Flanagan is affiliated with a libertarian group in Canada that supports legalizing marijuana, which suggests that he is not a social conservative. He has said little or nothing about abortion, same-sex marriage, or prayer in school in recent years.
The newspaper article is wrong in basing its criticism of Conservapedia on its premise that Ayn Rand was conservative and that Tom Flanagan is a social conservative. The article misleads readers into thinking that social conservatives are somehow critical of Conservapedia.
Feel free to email a letter to the editor of the Toronto Star.