Difference between revisions of "Talk:Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GodWarrior (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Can you write coherently please, I can't understand what you are trying to say. Please read your post again to see if it makes sense. I was asking for a source for this assertion, not for you to repeat it to me. If you want to put this information in an encyclopedia someone has to have made this point previously otherwise it's original research. [[User:GodWarrior|GodWarrior]] 23:09, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | :Can you write coherently please, I can't understand what you are trying to say. Please read your post again to see if it makes sense. I was asking for a source for this assertion, not for you to repeat it to me. If you want to put this information in an encyclopedia someone has to have made this point previously otherwise it's original research. [[User:GodWarrior|GodWarrior]] 23:09, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
::You may wish to actually notice there is a source before writing. That information is well documented. It's only been around for 2 millennia... I am serious that you need to study more. That you didn't know this and the concept is foreign to you is unfortunate. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT) | ::You may wish to actually notice there is a source before writing. That information is well documented. It's only been around for 2 millennia... I am serious that you need to study more. That you didn't know this and the concept is foreign to you is unfortunate. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Yes, I know you put a source. Thank you, that is all I was asking for. I was making the point that you shouldn't have put what seems like opinion in the article without sourcing it in the first place. This is basic stuff, you shouldn't have to be reminded. However, I still don't understand what you are trying to argue. You know the 300's and 400's is the same as the 4th and 5th century right? [[User:GodWarrior|GodWarrior]] 12:05, 25 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:05, August 25, 2007
You need to study more. There are many partial manuscripts than the full versions from the 300s and 400s A.D. Most works of antiquity have their earliest copies dating to the Middle Ages. The Bible stands alone for quantity of ancient manuscripts, reliability between copies, and early age of transcribing. And that doesn't even count the extra biblical writings of the early church fathers. Learn together 22:41, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- Can you write coherently please, I can't understand what you are trying to say. Please read your post again to see if it makes sense. I was asking for a source for this assertion, not for you to repeat it to me. If you want to put this information in an encyclopedia someone has to have made this point previously otherwise it's original research. GodWarrior 23:09, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- You may wish to actually notice there is a source before writing. That information is well documented. It's only been around for 2 millennia... I am serious that you need to study more. That you didn't know this and the concept is foreign to you is unfortunate. Learn together 03:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, I know you put a source. Thank you, that is all I was asking for. I was making the point that you shouldn't have put what seems like opinion in the article without sourcing it in the first place. This is basic stuff, you shouldn't have to be reminded. However, I still don't understand what you are trying to argue. You know the 300's and 400's is the same as the 4th and 5th century right? GodWarrior 12:05, 25 August 2007 (EDT)