Changes

This means that you would have to be [[omnipresent]]. You would also have to know everything about every part of the universe, so you would be [[omniscient]]. Then, just at the point when you proved that there was no God, you would also have proven that you were one.<ref>http://www.kennedycommentary.org/default.asp?pg=topicmessage&id=1419</ref>}}

This means that you would have to be [[omnipresent]]. You would also have to know everything about every part of the universe, so you would be [[omniscient]]. Then, just at the point when you proved that there was no God, you would also have proven that you were one.<ref>http://www.kennedycommentary.org/default.asp?pg=topicmessage&id=1419</ref>}}

Logician [[Mortimer Adler]] concurs with Dr. Kennedy that the standard definition of atheism which attempts to prove a universal negative is a self- defeating proposition and prominent atheists such as [[Gordon Stein]] and [[Carl Sagan]] have candidly stated that God's existence cannot be disproven.<ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref>

Logician [[Mortimer Adler]] concurs with Dr. Kennedy that the standard definition of atheism which attempts to prove a universal negative is a self- defeating proposition{{fact}} and prominent atheists such as [[Gordon Stein]] and [[Carl Sagan]] have candidly stated that God's existence cannot be disproven.<ref>http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm</ref>

Many Atheists concede that it is impossible to ''empirically'' disprove the existence of God, since we lack the capacity to examine the Universe in its entirety.  However, proponents of [[strong atheism|incoherency apologetics]] takes a different tack in its effort to disprove the existence of God: specifically, they point out that it is possible to prove universal negatives logically if it can be shown that the characteristics of the object in question contradict each other.  [[Strong atheism|Incoherency apologetics]] argues that many statements made about God are contradictory (as in the case of the [[problem of evil]]), and it is therefore logically impossible that there exists a God for which all the statements made about Him are true.  These arguments are limited, however, in that they can only challenge ''characteristics'' of God, and cannot prove that the ''being'' referred to as God does not exist.  Theistic responses include arguments that the claimed contradictions are not actual contradictions, and [[open theism]].

Many Atheists concede that it is impossible to ''empirically'' disprove the existence of God, since we lack the capacity to examine the Universe in its entirety.  However, proponents of [[strong atheism|incoherency apologetics]] takes a different tack in its effort to disprove the existence of God: specifically, they point out that is it very well  possible to prove universal negatives logically. A common approach in logic to prove universal negatives is to show that the characteristics of the object in question contradict each other.  [[Strong atheism|Incoherency apologetics]] argues that many statements made about God are contradictory (as in the case of the [[problem of evil]]), and it is therefore logically impossible that there exists a God for which all the statements made about Him are true.  These arguments are limited, however, in that they can only challenge ''characteristics'' of God, and cannot prove that the ''being'' referred to as God does not exist.  Theistic responses include arguments that the claimed contradictions are not actual contradictions, and [[open theism]].

===Atheism is Contrary to Reasonable Argument===

===Atheism is Contrary to Reasonable Argument===