Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
→a warning: ...and another one
Please do not put lame atheism apologetics in the atheism article. Lame atheism apologetics are not appropriate for a conservative encyclopedia. I don't want to block you and please heed this warning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:27, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
Please do not put lame atheism apologetics in the atheism article. Lame atheism apologetics are not appropriate for a conservative encyclopedia. I don't want to block you and please heed this warning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:27, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
:Where would atheist apologetics go if '''not''' in the article titled "Atheism"? [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 21:42, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
:Where would atheist apologetics go if '''not''' in the article titled "Atheism"? [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 21:42, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
Yeah, here's another warning - but first let me quote you:
*equating Stalinism with atheism is as much a fallacy as equating Christianity with the Spanish inquisition
I'm not sure where you're going with this, but it seems to be a denial of any link between Stalinism and atheism. This would seem to be an error, as Stalin promoted the atheism inherent in [[Dialectical Materialism]], which is the philosophical core of [[Communism]].
I warn you not to make false or confusing statements in talk pages. You wanna make an argument that persuades other users, try [[Debate:Was Stalin an atheist?]] or something like that. Don't use talk pages as a soapbox. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:54, 28 August 2007 (EDT)