Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sodom"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RightWolf2 (talk | contribs) |
RightWolf2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::::Very nice! I like--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:52, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ::::Very nice! I like--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:52, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | :::::Needs some additions. Particularly the fact that God explicitly stated they were destroyed for sodomy. Sodomy is | + | :::::Needs some additions. Particularly the fact that God explicitly stated they were destroyed for sodomy. Sodomy is explicitly defined in other passages as homosexual behavior. :-) [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 03:59, 12 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 07:59, March 12, 2007
This article is vastly opinionated.--Elamdri 03:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- It's an open encyclopedia. fix it then. RightWolf2 03:07, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- I feel that the changes are much more appropriate. They still advance the site's agenda without being blatantly hateful.--Elamdri 03:22, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- The Bible is not hate speech. I know the mass media and militant homosexual rights movement have intimidated most Believers into thinking so. I do tone things down and frame them properly, given time. RightWolf2 03:32, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- I have a rather long piece cued up. I'll post it in 5 minutes if I don't hear back on this. You can always revert it anyway.Crackertalk 03:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- I do not believe that the Bible is hate speech. However, I also do not trust the Bible to give non-biased depictions of events as it was written by men, divinely inspired they may be, but at the end of the day, still men.--Elamdri 03:47, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Needs some additions. Particularly the fact that God explicitly stated they were destroyed for sodomy. Sodomy is explicitly defined in other passages as homosexual behavior. :-) RightWolf2 03:59, 12 March 2007 (EDT)