1,523
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 574:
Line 574: + +
→Another definition of liberal -2
Given the record recently (in the post-Soviet era) of child sex abuse, opposition to human rights and democracy, support for mass murderers such as Saddam Hussein, how does this definition of "liberal", in "international politics", making any sense whatsoever? It only confuses an already confused situation. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:52, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
Given the record recently (in the post-Soviet era) of child sex abuse, opposition to human rights and democracy, support for mass murderers such as Saddam Hussein, how does this definition of "liberal", in "international politics", making any sense whatsoever? It only confuses an already confused situation. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:52, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
:Given whose record, the UN's? I said I'll debate that elsewhere with you. I'm more worried about the definition of liberal right now (which, again, no longer includes the UN, for this very reason). Liberalism does not have a record of "child sex abuse, opposition to human rights and democracy, support for mass murderers such as Saddam Hussein," unless you are applying the definition of liberal to the UN, which you said I could not do. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 18:03, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==