Difference between revisions of "Talk:Karl Marx"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by RichardT (Talk); changed back to last version by Geraldthebabyeater) |
(Undo revision 285885 by Special:Contributions/Geraldthebabyeater (User talk:Geraldthebabyeater)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
I don't even know where to start with this one... did whoever write this article actually read Capital (or any of Marx's works), or is she paraphrasing Wikipedia? | I don't even know where to start with this one... did whoever write this article actually read Capital (or any of Marx's works), or is she paraphrasing Wikipedia? | ||
| − | :Really, opium was a good thing? That's weird. I thought that statement would imply that religion is a drug that desensitizes people... (In Marx's opinion, of course) I don't know too much about this guy, but from what I've seen, he looks kind of um... | + | :Really, opium was a good thing? That's weird. I thought that statement would imply that religion is a drug that desensitizes people... (In Marx's opinion, of course) I don't know too much about this guy, but from what I've seen, he looks kind of um... whacked. [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 12:58, 28 June 2007 (EDT) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 16:45, September 4, 2007
I don't even know where to start with this one... did whoever write this article actually read Capital (or any of Marx's works), or is she paraphrasing Wikipedia?
- Really, opium was a good thing? That's weird. I thought that statement would imply that religion is a drug that desensitizes people... (In Marx's opinion, of course) I don't know too much about this guy, but from what I've seen, he looks kind of um... whacked. Mskreuz 12:58, 28 June 2007 (EDT)