Difference between revisions of "Debate:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since Conservapedia has been called unbalanced, I thought it would be good to start a discussion on this topic here in order to get a more varied opinion.{{Unsigned|Foo}} | Since Conservapedia has been called unbalanced, I thought it would be good to start a discussion on this topic here in order to get a more varied opinion.{{Unsigned|Foo}} | ||
:Well, that sounds fair.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 08:56, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | :Well, that sounds fair.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 08:56, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It seems to be horribly biased toward protest-antism. --[[User:Luke-Jr|Luke-Jr]] 10:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:42, March 12, 2007
Since Conservapedia has been called unbalanced, I thought it would be good to start a discussion on this topic here in order to get a more varied opinion.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Foo (talk)
- Well, that sounds fair.--TerryH 08:56, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- It seems to be horribly biased toward protest-antism. --Luke-Jr 10:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)