Difference between revisions of "Debate:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added comment) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:It seems to be horribly biased toward protest-antism. --[[User:Luke-Jr|Luke-Jr]] 10:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | :It seems to be horribly biased toward protest-antism. --[[User:Luke-Jr|Luke-Jr]] 10:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Yes== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==No== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seems to me to be quite biased. [[User:Linus M.|Geekman314]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 11:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:25, March 12, 2007
Since Conservapedia has been called unbalanced, I thought it would be good to start a discussion on this topic here in order to get a more varied opinion.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Foo (talk)
- Well, that sounds fair.--TerryH 08:56, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- It seems to be horribly biased toward protest-antism. --Luke-Jr 10:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Yes
No
Seems to me to be quite biased. Geekman314(contact me) 11:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT)