Changes

So you reserve license to publicly degrade others, and then give me the task of doing your research for you?  You are the author of this essay, in which you essentially call your political opponents stupid and overrated.  The burden of proof is on YOU to defend your claims and refute the achievements of these respected people, since YOU are making those statements.  So far, your justifications have been along the lines of "his parents had money" and "he got bad grades in college."  Did you know Clinton was a Rhodes scholar?

So you reserve license to publicly degrade others, and then give me the task of doing your research for you?  You are the author of this essay, in which you essentially call your political opponents stupid and overrated.  The burden of proof is on YOU to defend your claims and refute the achievements of these respected people, since YOU are making those statements.  So far, your justifications have been along the lines of "his parents had money" and "he got bad grades in college."  Did you know Clinton was a Rhodes scholar?

In any case, I've already provided an example:  Oppenheimer led the effort to develop the atomic bomb.  You credit Teller for H-bomb work, but not Oppenheimer for A-bomb work.  You ignored my question about this inconsistent position.

In any case, I've already provided an example:  Oppenheimer led the effort to develop the atomic bomb.  You credit Teller for H-bomb work, but not Oppenheimer for A-bomb work.  How do you justify that position?

I'll ask again:  Can someone be both "liberal" and an "intellectual"?--[[User:Bayes|Bayes]] 17:39, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

I would still like to know:  Can someone be both "liberal" and an "intellectual"?--[[User:Bayes|Bayes]] 17:39, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

==Motivation==

==Motivation==